Talk:Landsat 2
 | Landsat 2 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 28, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Landsat 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Landsat 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 03:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Reviewing later.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 03:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ref 8 does not work.
- Manufacturer info do not match in prose and infobox.
- The lead might be a bit short. Maybe add what it did on its mission.
- Locations should be linked if possible.
- Is there info on how many pictures Landsat 2 took?
- I'm not sure, but I think you have to write out the abbreviations in the citations.
I think that's it.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 05:13, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed Ref 8, fixed manufacturer mismatch (nice catch!), expanded lead, linked locations, and expanded abbreviation of USGS. I did not find any info on the number of photos Landsat 2 took. Kees08 (Talk) 06:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC)