Talk:Las Pozas of Xilitla Mexico

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico

Visual arts

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Andrew Calvin Peer Review

Hey I just looked over your article and it looks like it is coming together well. I think your topic of these amazing surrealistic structures is really interesting and made me want to look up more information about this topic. Some things I thought were great about your article was the lead in which I was immediately able to understand what your topic was about as well as the neutral tone that you establish throughout the article, it does not seem bias and is more informational which is awesome. Some suggestions I would give you is to add subheadings to make sure that there is a clear structure within the article some examples could be a subheading for the location, history, and conservation efforts of Los Pozas as well as adding citations to the information you add into the draft. Overall, your article is looking good and adding subheadings to structure your article will really help. The neutral tone of your article is really great as well, I myself am having a hard time making sure my article has a neutral tone so looking at your article will defiantly help me out. Great work keep it up! Acalvin1 (talk) 21:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Serafina Smyth Peer Review

Lead:

I like and understand your edits to the original article. I feel that you have a much more solid lead compared to the original article.

Structure:

In terms of structure, I would definitely break up the information a bit more into different subjects. Make it a bit more clear about which part you are editing in terms of outline, but I do understand what sentences you have edited to make more sense.

Balance/Neutrality:

You seem very neutral in this topic, I feel very informed by what you have written so far.

Sourcing:

I suggest finding a bit more sources to incorporate just to make the article stronger. Other than that it seems good!

I'm really enjoying your article, I can't wait to see the end product! Serafinaxsmyth (talk) 19:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Article is moving along nicely! However, you're going to need more sources. ProfHanley (talk) 18:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]