Jump to content

Talk:Laughlin, Nevada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening comment

[edit]

Laughlin is a tourist destination in Nevada, and should probably be expanded beyond the basic census information and hot air balloon pictures. Isopropyl 23:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


"top 5 destinations for American RV enthusiasts. [2" The reference page is an error and I couldn't find anything, anywhere that backed up this claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.118.113.38 (talk) 20:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:View of the Laughlin, Nevada, skyline from across the Colorado River in Bullhead City.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:View of the Laughlin, Nevada, skyline from across the Colorado River in Bullhead City.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Most of the Laughlin hotels line the Colorado River.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Most of the Laughlin hotels line the Colorado River.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laughlin Library.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Laughlin Library.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Economy

[edit]

The Economy section is a mess. It reads like a newspaper editorial and has zero references. Anyone care to help me clean it up? Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above named section was sourced mainly to primary sources, such as tax assessments from which the author derived conclusions, aka WP:OR. Notice that the above sentence is in past tense. That is because I just deleted the entire section. If someone wishes to write an economy section based on secondary sources and reporting a NPOV, feel free. Gtwfan52 (talk) 04:01, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Laughlin, Nevada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:20, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laughlin, Nevada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Laughlin,_Nevada&oldid=1249445820"