Talk:Laughlin, Nevada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Nevada / Las Vegas (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Laughlin, Nevada is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the U.S. state of Nevada. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Las Vegas (marked as High-importance).
 

Opening comment[edit]

Laughlin is a tourist destination in Nevada, and should probably be expanded beyond the basic census information and hot air balloon pictures. Isopropyl 23:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


"top 5 destinations for American RV enthusiasts. [2" The reference page is an error and I couldn't find anything, anywhere that backed up this claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.118.113.38 (talk) 20:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

File:View of the Laughlin, Nevada, skyline from across the Colorado River in Bullhead City.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:View of the Laughlin, Nevada, skyline from across the Colorado River in Bullhead City.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Most of the Laughlin hotels line the Colorado River.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Most of the Laughlin hotels line the Colorado River.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Laughlin Library.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Laughlin Library.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Economy[edit]

The Economy section is a mess. It reads like a newspaper editorial and has zero references. Anyone care to help me clean it up? Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

The above named section was sourced mainly to primary sources, such as tax assessments from which the author derived conclusions, aka WP:OR. Notice that the above sentence is in past tense. That is because I just deleted the entire section. If someone wishes to write an economy section based on secondary sources and reporting a NPOV, feel free. Gtwfan52 (talk) 04:01, 29 November 2012 (UTC)