Talk:Lauren-Ashley

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Country music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

(no header)

This article is very well done, though the lead needs to use more pronouns to avoid over using Lauren-Ashley's name. I would like to point out, though, that it doesn't appear that Lauren-Ashley meets the criteria of being a notable musician. wikipedia defines a notable musician as being someone who meets one of the following:

Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes school newspapers, personal blogs, etc.).
Has had a hit on a national music chart in at least one large or medium-sized country.[1]
Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one large or medium-sized country.
Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster including several notable performers).
Has won a major music award, such as a Choice Music Prize, Grammy Award, Juno Award or Mercury Prize.

As I see it, she has not met any of these criteria. Correct me if I'm wrong. But it is still a well written article.--Jtbunting1 (talk) 22:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First thing I noticed is that there is a lack of very credible sources. All of them are local and not recognized by a state or even more than a county level. However there are a lot of links and the article is no orphan giving a clearer picture. There is also a slight bias toward GSU in the article, not surprising but needed to be fixed. This artist does not seem to meet the notable artist standard for Wikipedia as well, missing several credits such as national notice in sources and winning a major award such as a Grammy, and a major record label. The article is well written and the style and spelling are all free of errors. A bit more work needed. MissesKZ (talk) 22:55, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think your article is great! TyreeshaEvans (talk) 22:13, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lauren-ashley.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lauren-ashley.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained content removal

An IP has been removing large sections of the article, with an edit summary of "wrong person" or simply, "wrong". I'll leave this here as a place for discussion, if necessary. Ifnord (talk) 19:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scam site

The website linked to this article, "laurenashleymusic.com", leads to a scam website. It was probably hacked. Please remove the site from the page. 2601:8C1:17F:D5A0:E539:3550:F7DB:94EB (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]