Talk:Leander Schnerr/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 20:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links

Prose

Lede

Link for archabbot? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done it goes to Abbot --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In 1892, Schnerr was elected as Archabbot. - I feel like this is obvious from what's been said before this. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Link for Archabbey? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done it goes to Abbey which is a dreadful article --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General

Covington, Kentucky where - locations need a comma after. Check throughout. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
apostolic nuncio - the what? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Linked. I will need to think of the WP:SEAOFBLUE fix. --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - That does need a fix, but I won't hold up promotion due to it. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Does Ernest Helmstetter meet WP:REDLINK? And even if so, can we say who he is? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- He has enough obits that I think so. Explained. --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review meta comments

I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}
- No copyvio found, spot checks came up fine. Nicely done. If you enjoyed the review, feel free to take a look at some of my nominations, otherwise, congratulations, I shall pass this article now.Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.