Leeds Convention is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
A fact from Leeds Convention appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 April 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the 1917 Leeds Convention in Britain passed resolutions calling for the end of the First World War and praising the February Revolution in Russia?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that although the 1917 socialist Leeds Convention(location pictured) raised the concerns of George V, it had little practical effect? Source: "Even King George V was “greatly disturbed”, asking pro-war Labour MP Will Thorne, “Do you think that any ill will come from this Conference at Leeds and the decisions that were made there?” ... Yet despite little emerging practically out of it, the Leeds Convention of 1917 still deserves to be remembered" from: Høgsbjerg, Christian (31 May 2017). "A most remarkable gathering". Socialist Worker. Retrieved 24 November 2022.
ALT1: ... that the 1917 Leeds Convention(location pictured) in Britain passed resolutions calling for the end of the First World War and praising the February Revolution in Russia? Source: "In late May the four resolutions to be voted on at Leeds were published. The first three (hailing the Russian Revolution, calling for an end to the war and defending civil liberties) fitted with demands at previous gatherings, but the fourth resolution called for something new — the establishment “in every town, urban, and rural district” of “Councils of Workmen’s and Soldiers’ Delegates” ... the resolutions were all passed almost unanimously." from: Høgsbjerg, Christian (31 May 2017). "A most remarkable gathering". Socialist Worker. Retrieved 24 November 2022.
Overall: A great article and a great nomination. Nice work, Dumelow! Note that two of the three sources are offline books that I am accepting in good faith. Note also that the high percentage chance of plagiarism given by Earwig's tool consists almost entirely of quotations, which I do not believe are excessive after reading the article. Michael Barera (talk) 06:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]