Talk:Legend-class cutter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Ships (Rated B-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.WikiProject icon
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
WikiProject Military history (Rated B-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Is the Department of Homeland Security not notable or not reliable?[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Security_Cutter&curid=13049399&diff=519248880&oldid=519207978

That edit doesn't make clear what the editors problem with DHS is. Hcobb (talk) 19:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

DHS is not reliable.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 01:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1) Why is DHS not reliable? 2) The cite that was removed in that diff was not DHS. It some site called " www.fiercehomelandsecurity.com"... whatever that is. - theWOLFchild 14:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Funding for 7th & 8th ships has apparently been approved[edit]

http://www.staradvertiser.com/newspremium/20130723_Funding_approved_for_2_new_cutters_slated_for_Hawaii.html?id=216549121

According to the article, funding has been approved and the cutters will be stationed in Hawaii.Maltytasker (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Security Cutter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)