Talk:Lensbaby
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lensbaby article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 November 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Advertising
[edit]Have to say that even after edit, this still reads pretty much as an advertisement. The lenses have many "bad" characteristics, that are obvious to experienced photographers, but are not obvious to some new photographers. I read some of the "notable" photographic equipment reviewers and these bad characteristics are noted there. I guess that this kind of information does belong to a NPOV article. The article as it is now is misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.232.221.29 (talk) 08:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
i agree, this article reads like its the company's website. My guess is that the term Lensbaby (article's title) is trademarked.
Well said SineBot. Furthermore information such as production sites are not disclosed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maebiki (talk • contribs) 01:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class glass articles
- Low-importance glass articles
- Start-Class glass articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Glass articles
- Start-Class Photography articles
- Unknown-importance Photography articles
- WikiProject Photography articles