This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This stub asserts that she gave ideas to Paul Erickson subsequently incorporated into The Ark. Yet, according to, the Doctor Who Magazine Special Edition, "In Their Own Words, 1963-1969", she contributed nothing at all to the serial. He just "gifted" her full writing credit more or less out of love. If evidence can be given to support the claim of the stub as it stands, please provide it. Until then, a factual accuracy tag will be applied here. CzechOut10:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Given the unlikely possibility that anyone will update this page any time soon, I made a few changes that removed the inaccuracy and tried to give some notability for the article. CzechOut15:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is new evidence pointing to the fact that this person is not only dishonest, but indeed quite ugly. Should this be added to the article? I find it to be relevant to the points made here, given that this "writer" is a confirmed Nazi sympathizer. 20:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.43.32.86 (talk)
.jpg){kind=small}