Jump to content

Talk:Levosalbutamol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The INN appears to be levosalbutamol (see first result of Google search for "levalbuterol inn"... it's Martindale, but I can't access it directly since I don't have a login). --Galaxiaad 19:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice catch—WHO list confirms this. This is pretty uncontroversial, so I've moved the page accordingly. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:46, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

is it also the L-isomer

[edit]

R and S enatiomers are used in chemistry.

Is it the L-isomer? if yes, please add somewhere to the article even if it is redundant. 163.40.12.37 (talk) 04:28, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"There is no reason to use levosalbutamol over salbutamol."

[edit]

This is a very strongly worded line for a Wikipedia entry. While most studies have shown little/no difference in efficacy, there are instances where it might be superior over albuterol (need for frequent doses of a beta2 agonist.)

That line is a quote from one study. Here are studies that do not quite support that line:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3229776/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9847435/ http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/719008

Just mitchin (talk) 03:29, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We typically stick with summarizing recent reviews. The conclusions of the 2013 review is "Levalbuterol was not superior to albuterol regarding efficacy and safety in subjects with acute asthma. We suggest that levalbuterol should not be used over albuterol for acute asthma."
Have adjusted the wording to better match that. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:13, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Levosalbutamol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]