Talk:Lewis Benson

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Quakers Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) (assessed as Mid-importance).

Stub

Thanks for creating this stub, whoever it was.

I belong to the New Foundation Fellowship, a group heavily influenced by the work and thought of Lewis Benson, many of us, having known Lewis, personally.

We hope to contribute much more detail to this stub in the near future. Allistair Lomax (talk) 13:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kennard Wing

I have added the first part of a recent biography of Lewis Benson by Kennard Wing which was published in New Foundation Papers. I will add the rest once I tidied up the part I have added already

I have added as many links as possible and I need to add a number of citations. Please bear with me, as I am discovering that contributing to Wiki is slow work! Allistair Lomax (talk) 19:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope people will help by cleaning up my mistakes, as I'm pretty new to Wiki

Allistair Lomax (talk) 20:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please beware of copyright violation. If you are quoting large chunks of a published work, you must ensure that you have the necessary permission, otherwise the material will be deleted on sight. If you don't then you must summarise and paraphrase it, supplying citations in either case. --NSH001 (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks NSH001. Happily, I know Kennard personally, and I obtained his permission prior to using the material reproduced here. He's currently researching some other sources for me.Allistair Lomax (talk) 10:18, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, is this article still classifiable as a stub? Allistair Lomax (talk) 10:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I oversimplified yesterday. Material on Wikipedia is automatically released under a "free" licence, meaning that it can be freely used by anybody, including for commercial purposes, provided that the original author is credited, and that a similar condition is imposed on subsequent users of the material. You must therefore provide a citation to your source. Not only should you do this, you also need to obtain permission in writing from the copyright holder, and record this permission formally - there is a system called OTRS for doing this. For more detailed info and the precise legal definitions, see WP:COPY.

Having said all this, I still think it is better to write the article in your own words, using multiple sources, of which Kennard would be one. Copy/pasting large chunks from elsewhere makes a very poor encyclopaedia article. Take a look at some of the articles in Category:FA-Class biography articles for examples of how to write a top-quality bio article (don't worry, no-one's expecting you to do this overnight!). I suggest you start by dividing it up into sections according to the Manual of style.

On whether this article is still a stub, yes it could be uprated to start-class, but only once the copyright issue is resolved, since as it stands most of the material could legitimately be removed as a WP:COPYVIO.

--NSH001 (talk) 17:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]