Talk:Life After God

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Short stories?

Erm, while the book contains stories, there's an overarching central narrative, and the stories told form part of, and illustrate, this narrative. It's really not a short story collection. Last time I read anyway. Anyone mind if I edit? --Plumbago 19:58, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be approaching it too abstractly. This is a short story collection, whether you'd like to think so or not. Your interpretation does not count as fact unless you can cite it from a reference. -- LGagnon 20:56, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Doh! It's a fair cop. I read the book about 8 years ago and since then Alzheimer's Disease appears to have set in. ;) It is a collection of short stories, but I seemed to be conflating them into a novel in my memory because of the similar tone and themes throughout. My apologies. --Plumbago 13:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to comment (actually criticize) the idea behind Life Without God. It is basically a beautiful story: the narrator wants meaning in his life. This is normal. What Coupland misses, and I think it is important, is that people can have meaning in their lives without a supreme being. I would refer anyone to the works of Bertram Russell or Paul Kurtz. Also, consider Buddists: they are spiritual but a devine being is not central, or even important, to their spirituality. I suspect human beings have a natural spiritualiy as part of the 'hardware' of our brains and the specific details of one's spirtuality depends on culture (the 'software'.) This is similar to language. I strongly suspect if we get to such a point of lack of belief we will find plenty of meaning in nature, acts of selfless charity, love of friends and family, and art. I think such meaning is better than meaning from a belief in a diety for whom there is no objective evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gimpydoc (talk • contribs) 16:47, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

Yah this is from someone else. I don't really think you're supposed to criticize works on Wikipedia, even in the discussion section. You should go on a reviewing website or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.182.30 (talk) 23:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lifeaftergod.jpg

Image:Lifeaftergod.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved . Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 22:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Life After God → Life after God – If we look at the book cover File:Lifeaftergod.jpg we see the A is a lowercase, so it should be 'after'. Only the L and G get capitalized. Y12J (talk) 09:35, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Wikipedia's own capitalisation rules - prepositions longer than 4 letters should be capitalised. 86.146.221.44 (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; the orthography used by the cover artist is irrelevant. Powers ^T 20:51, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per 81 and Powers. Jenks24 (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.