Talk:List of The Rose of Versailles episodes

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Episode templates

The following message originally came from User talk:Ned Scott [1]:

I apologize, I just thought that, as an anime series, it should be in the designated anime format. It has worked for many series before (see: List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes, List of Oh My Goddess episodes). Also, I find it more aestheticly pleasing when the kanji titles are present. I wish to discuss this further so that we may come to a reasonable conclusion, please respond at the Talk:List of Lady Oscar episodes page. - ChibiViqor 09/14/06

As suggested, discussion continues here:

{{List of Anime Episodes TV}} isn't the designated anime format, it just is titled to include the word anime. {{Japanese episode list}} was created for use on anime lists, but I titled it as "Japanese" instead of anime to be more flexible. Neither has "official" status, but Japanese episode list is one of the WikiProject List of Television Episodes templates. Japanese episode list is used by over 50 articles (most, if not all, anime), while List of Anime Episodes TV is used by under 10. I'm a bit confused when you say that the kanji titles aren't present, since.. they are.

If you really want to use List of Anime Episodes TV then do so, but to me it is not the better of the two. I only switched it here because I did not think you where aware of the other template. -- Ned Scott 04:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First, to clear things up, I did not say that the Kanji titles are not present in the {{Japanese episode list}} format, only that I found it more aesthetically pleasing to not have the English title, Romaji title, and the Kanji title all in the same box. However, I must thank you for clearing up a misunderstanding on my part. I am new to the community and made the (aguably) logical assumption that since there was a format called "List of Anime Episodes TV", that it was designed specifically to be used for anime. The presence of a {{Japanese episode list}} format and a "List of Anime Episodes TV" format led me to the conclusion that one was to be used with anime (as the title suggests), leaving the other for Live action programs such as Dramas.

I shall leave it the way it is, as you are quite obviously the senior member, and only hope that you will forgive my misstep so that we can prehaps work more amicably together in the future. -- ChibiViqor

Don't do it because I've "been here longer", and you don't need to apologies. Conversations like these are very common on Wikipedia, and they're not bad at all. Like I said before, I personally like one template over the other, but neither are "official". I don't want the template to be used if it was because I intimidated someone. Even if we were to completely disagree on something like this, that would not stop us from being able to work together on articles, nor would I take it personally. Your opinion always counts, no matter how new you are. -- Ned Scott 06:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that an opinion should count no matter the experience of the user. I was not entirely clear on my meaning, what I ment was more along the lines of "I didn't know that" and "based on the evidence presented and at hand, I am led to the conclusion that the episode list should stay in the format that it is currently in because it appears to be more widely spread and more commonly known." --ChibiViqor 8/16/06

Notice

I have just finished adding in summaries of every single ROV episode. Just a notice. Nights1stStar 22:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of The Rose of Versailles episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]