Talk:List of V for Vendetta characters

Valerie Page was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 01 June 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of V for Vendetta characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Storm Saxon was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 May 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of V for Vendetta characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article was nominated for deletion on August 27, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Film: Comic book

	Film portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.

Comics: British / DC Comics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Related work groups:
/
	This redirect is supported by British comics work group.
	This redirect is supported by DC Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[V for Vendetta#Characters]] The anchor (#Characters) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Should this be a mix between the movie and the graphic novel? What do you think the scope should be? --P-Chan 20:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title/layout

Needs to be changed to List of characters in V for Vendetta
V and Evey should be first, with a link to their main articles.Cvene64 06:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those changes sound good. I have a question that I never asked anyone yet. Should we have it so that the we have a common page that mixes the film and the novel characters side-by-side or should we have two seperate pages for characters? I think it would be less hassle in terms of setting up pages if we did seperate (we'd just fill in the blanks). If we had them mixed, it would be harder, but there may be the potential to create a much sleeker looking product in the end. I'm 100% open to either. --P-Chan 07:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I say we keep it as one. Having two could just be repeating ourselves. Although..Having one creates a bit of a conflict..aka..should we have a comic or film image..hmm..Cvene64 09:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, did not quite explain that. There is currently two images for each character. This cannot stay, as it would most definately violate Fair-use. Cvene64 09:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Finch

The article of Eric Finch appears to have been merged with the main V for Vendetta page. The bulk of information on him seems to have been lost. Also, wouldn't it have been more logical to have merged it with this page that has no information on this important character at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.222.56 (talk) 08:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links?

No pages link to this page. It is hard to access. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.222.56 (talk) 20:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Creedy.jpg

Image:Creedy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dascombe.jpg

Image:Dascombe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think if Helen Heyer is deserving of her own write-up then so is Rosemary Almond. She has as much, if not more exposure and plays a vital role in the climax. - Jeremiah Hicks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.252.209 (talk) 10:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]