This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
I'm not convinced that the Oklahoma City bombing should be included on this list. First, it wasn't an action wherein one group came into armed conflict with another group. It was simply someone parking a large, explosive device in front of a federal building and setting it to detonate. Now I'm certain that it could be argued that one consequence was intended to be an armed uprising against the federal government, but that did not happen. I simply want to get a discussion started about this piece of history being included on the list and arrive at a consensus. I am certainly open to having my mind changed. Spacini (talk) 14:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]