Talk:List of chiropractic credentials

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Formatting around refs[edit]

Some general comments about refs. Refs are always placed immediately (no spacing) AFTER punctuation. When there are several refs after each other, there is no spacing or punctuation in between them. -- Brangifer (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other changes that should be made: copy edits using default formats around headings; no unwarranted caps in headings except first letter; eliminate some double blank spaces between words; fix formats around refs; better refs code {{reflist}} . -- Brangifer (talk) 20:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the information regarding the education of the FCCSC(C) is not entirely correct either. Here is some more information, regarding the CMCC sports residency program that most Fellows of the CCSC(C) go through - CMCC.ca DigitalC (talk) 21:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Is the New York State Board of Regents really considered a National accrediting agency? By its very nature, it seems it would be a regional (state-wide) agency. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. I know it's counter-intuitive but, it's considered National in scope, see : US Dept of Education Site

See:

"including distance education offered by those institutions, that designate the agency as their sole or primary nationally recognized accrediting agency"

Д-рСДжП,ДС 18:46, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original research[edit]

While all of the tables in this article contain some valuable references, all of the explanatory material is essentially original research and reflects the author's personal knowledge and experience, but not any actual verifiable facts. Can anyone address this concern? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate help in this, but I shall look into finding more references to back up the statements. Or I will alter them appropriately Д-рСДжП,ДС 18:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements[edit]

The headers were just ridiculous. I tried a temporary fix at least to make the TOC not look absolutely abysmal. All of these claims in what used to be the "notes" were unsubstantiated and unreferenced themselves. It's also just a hard page to read in general, and very confusing given the varied and excessive qualifiers that separate each header. Definitely need to work on this page. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 04:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on List of chiropractic credentials. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_chiropractic_credentials&oldid=1195533474"