Talk:List of counties of the United Kingdom

List?

This article isn't really a list. Its a mix of things that really don't come under the banner of counties: Lieutenancy areas (Scotland), scotland regions, etc. It also forks lots of existing articles, which isn't the function of a list. MRSC • Talk 08:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok. I've completed a full list of England and Wales. Still Scotland and Northern Ireland to do. MRSC • Talk 12:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Lists and split lists

This is a United Kingdom article, as much for those beyond the UK as in it. The protocol is to keep such material together, not split it up regionally. Nevertheless separated lists might help to analyse the detail where there are particular statutory provisions analysed. Sundered lists too appear to demote Scottish counties to an afterthough, which is an injustice. Howard Alexander (talk) 19:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. --Jza84 |  Talk  01:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

The aggregated UK list is problematic. It tries to compare like-with-like when each area has different histories and changes. Gwent, for example, was not a 'non-metropolitan county'. It was just a 'county' or possibly 'Welsh county'. There should either be a UK list only or just the list by constituent countries, rather than repeat the same information on the same article. MRSC • Talk 09:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

The UK list was very confusing and would need to be laid out differently if it is to be reinstated. Keith D (talk) 14:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see the rationale to split these now. OK, that's fine, it was something I'd overlooked. --Jza84 |  Talk  16:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Postal county/former postal county

Some counties were added to the postal county list which are not postal counties as defined by the Royal Mail. Counties held in the alias file under "administrative"/"traditional" are not postal counties. MRSC • Talk 09:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

But all three kinds are permissible as part of a postal address - why just pick one of the alias fields and pretend it is the sole allowable "postal county"? Either list all three alias fields, or put them all together under a "postally acceptable" column as I have. Owain (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

They were added again without edit summary. Postal county is a defined term and we should refect that definition, not synthesise our own. Absolutely anything is 'postally allowable' now as a substitute for the postal county, but that doesn't mean it has become a postal county. MRSC • Talk 15:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Nobody is synthesising anything. You are choosing to list only one of the three county alias fields from the PAF Alias file, and thus demonstrating a PoV. If "postal county" is a defined term according to the Royal Mail, then so is "traditional county". Choosing only one of them is PoV. Owain (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Another problem is: who knows what information is included under "traditional" county? Could include Huntingdon and Peterbrough, Edinburghshire, Isle of Ely, Haddingtonshire, Zetland, Tweeddale, Parts of Lindsey, County of London.... without a copy of the PAF (all of it) any addition is WP:OR. Same is true of the "Administrative County" field. I have seen an address listed as in "County Conwy" before now. That could include Greater Manchester, Greater London, all of the mini non-met counties (e.g. Blackburn & Darwen, Milton Keynes, City of Bristol). So we have no definitive list of any of these, *and* neither does the Royal Mail according to the source! The former postal counties, on the other hand have been clearly defined and until 1996 had a real status. I suspect the all the stuff in the "alias" file is to help deliver mail when all else fails.Lozleader (talk) 15:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

That's a bit disingenuous. Without a copy of the PAF how do we know what the is in the "former postal county" field? They had been clearly defined, but where is the current definitive list? In the same place that the current definitive list of "traditional" counties are - i.e. in the PAF itself. Their list clearly doesn't contain things like Huntingdon and Peterborough and Lindsey as those are not by definition "traditional counties". In fact it is the same data as in the ABC gazetteer of place names. If a definitive list is needed for one type of alias data, then clearly it is needed for both. As I suggested earlier, either we list both, or neither. Anything else is clearly selective and PoV. Owain (talk) 05:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

AFAIK there is no official definition of "traditional counties". One person's "tradition" is not anothers: it's completely subjective. Also all traditions are invented at some point in time see appeal to tradition. Is there any evidence that the Royal Mail would use the ABC database? The PAF guide states that the information is neither comprehensive or accurate. I would suggest that many places have more than one "traditional" county (e.g. Bristol, which has been a county of itself for 613 of the last 635 years, but also has Gloucestershire and Somerset connections; or Chester which had county status centuries before Cheshire was formed). In some senses there is still a "tradition" of a county of Avon: its name lives on in many organisations despite its demise, and there is a "Huntingdon and Peterborough County" in rugby union. The Isle of Ely predates Cambridgeshire as an administrative entity, so surely has "tradition" on its side. There is no one set!

Is there any evidence that the Royal Mail would use the ABC database?. Yes. The Royal Mail Address Management Centre state that they get their data from the ABC. Whether you agree with it or not, for the Royal Mail database, there is one set - i.e. the traditional county field in the Alias product. Owain (talk) 08:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

There is a definitive list of former postal counties in the "Post Town Gazetteer" (see chapter 18 of the PAF guide). Unfortunately it costs £58.75 to buy! I have a list from the 1980s: unfortunately its only part of a Royal Mail leaflet, so not citable, as I'm sure the rest was binned twenty years ago! The postal counties were frozen in 1996 apart from Rutland, so it's probably more or less accurate...

The point is that the Post Town Gazetteer is a comprehensive list and was once used to deliver letters, showing that the former postal county has (or had) a formal status. The alias is not, it's just some (but not all) odd bits and pieces that people might add to addresses, including alternative names for streets, informal locality names etcetera. Lozleader 12:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Of course, the problem is that postal "counties" were not really counties at all, just information added to an address to identify similar sounding post towns. As the minister said in 1974 when asked about them "Postal addresses are routing instructions, not geographical descriptions". I worked in a sorting office one Christmas (back in my student days) and we used the counties to make sure all the non-local mail got in the right sack and on the right train. Anywhere unfamiliar without a county on the address was left in one spot to be checked via the reference books. This was where the postcode helped. The local mail was all sorted by postcode or postcode sector. Lozleader (talk) 13:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

The list of postal counties in on p. 196 of the source cited. MRSC • Talk 07:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

County Borough of Londonderry

Just to clarify: the county borough (the area to which a Lord-Lieutenant and high sheriff is appointed) is still called Londonderry. The change of the name of the city council and local government district did not effect this.[1] [2] In fact the county borough is a much smaller entity than the local government district (3.4 square miles according to Whitaker's Almanac), being "frozen" on the 1973 boundaries. it is clearly shown in the "Ordnance Survey Complete Road Atlas of Ireland". I don't think there is actually any mechanism for changing the name of the county borough: possibly amending the Local Government (Ireland) Act 1898? The name of the city is, on reflection, different again and involves applying to HM for a new charter. Even if that happened I don't think it effects the county borough... Lozleader (talk) 12:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I defer to your knowledge on this Loz. Sorry for the misunderstanding. As I now understand it, there are three entities: Derry City Council (renamed from Londonderry in recent decades), City of Londonderry borough council and Londonderry city itself. Let me know if that's correct as you understand it. --Setanta747 (talk) 16:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

That's about right, but I think there might be *four* entities! 1) Derry City Council (we all know what that is) 2) City of Londonderry Corporation or Borough Council or whatever (the entity created by the charter, still exists and has identical membership to no.1 but has a distinct legal existence), 3) The City of Londonderry (the area covered by the charter of no.2) and 4) The county borough of Londonderry (the area to which a lord lieutenant and a high sheriff are appointed). No.4 has the same area as the the pre 1973 borough, which makes it pretty small. Is it too much to hope that someoner would tidy this up in the forthcoming local government reform? Probably :-)

Lozleader (talk) 11:02, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Heh! Not only are you dealing with politicians, but you're talking about politicians from Northern Ireland! ;) Cheers. --Setanta747 (talk) 04:25, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Imagemap

an imagemap would be cool (and useful) here if anyone can be bothered...... Dendodge .. Talk^Contribs 16:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Numbering

I'm not sure this is needed. It implies these entities existed all at the same time and/or had parity of status. MRSC • Talk 12:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Forks of earlier versions of this article

I have nominated for deletion two forks of earlier versions of this article (County-level areas in the United Kingdom‎ and Counties and similar areas in the United Kingdom‎). MRSC • Talk 08:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Meaning of NB:

The main article section "England" starts with this abbreviation. The sentence itself is awkward so I am changing it and dropping the abbreviation. If this is an error on my part please edit or revert the sentence and explain the abbreviation here or elsewhere. Arbalest Mike (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of counties of the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928060517/http://www.ros.gov.uk/pdfs/map.pdf to http://www.ros.gov.uk/pdfs/map.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

List Of Counties In The UK

A

Aberdeenshire, Anglesey, Angus, Antrim, Argyll, Armagh, Avon, Ayrshire

Redirect from "list of counties in England by area"?

The original article "List of counties in England by area" would be really useful right about now, and I would expect it to have its own page if List of English counties by highest point does too. Should this be more consistent? Delete one, or add one?

Area information is in List of ceremonial counties of England (a sortable list). I've just redirected List of English counties by area there, instead. -- Dr Greg  talk  22:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Milton Keynes is a county but not a ceremonial county Saxonanglo (talk) 14:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Counterintuitive pronunciations

I suggest that the pronunciations of Gloucestershire, Leicestershire, Tyne and Wear and Warwickshire are also counterintuitive (being pronounced Glostershire, Lestershire, Tyne and Wier and Worrickshire respectively). I attempted to add these but was stopped by the emoji filter. 94.175.81.123 (talk) 09:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Milton Keynes

Milton Keynes is the smallest county in England but is not included in the list of counties. Milton Keynes.gov.uk advise me that Milton Keynes is the borough and county of Milton Keynes. Buckinghamshire purely acts for Milton Keynes on ceremonial matters Saxonanglo (talk) 14:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Please can someone add South Gloucestershire as a county? This list is also missing Somerset, Bath and North East Somerset (BaNES), North Somerset. I couldn't work out how to add it to the table! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.176.215 (talk) 13:20, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Both of the above comments are about English unitary authorities, which are non-metropolitan counties in their own right. This article seems to exclude unitary authorities, except those that have same name as a ceremonial county. So a decision is needed either to add all unitary authorities to this list, or to continue to exclude them in which case an explanation of the exclusion needs to be added to the article. -- Dr Greg  talk  18:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Well fairly obviously we need to decide whether this article is a list of ceremonial counties, of administrative counties (aka UAs) or [perish the thought], historical counties. (More immediately, I have corrected the line for Buckinghamshire to state that it has two UAs. Unlike Bedfordshire and Northamptonshire, which were divided into uniquely named UAs with no risk of ambiguity, the UA fo South and Mid Bucks was not given a unique name, which is why we get this sort of misunderstanding.) --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

IMO, in the case of ceremonial counties that have acquired multiple UAs, the row should have subsidiary cells in the relevant column ("from 1974"?). For example, the line for Bedfordshire would show three UAs (Bedford Borough, Mid Bedfordshire, Luton). We should not have lines for counties in name only, like MK and Swindon, that have been created for administrative convenience to avoid having to amend hundreds of Acts going back to Edward II. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

And we should not collude with the pretence that the territories of Buckinghamshire Council and Wiltshire Council are the only valid users of the respective county name, just because of a HMG cock-up that wasn't repeated when Bedfordshire and Northamptonshire were split. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Uniformity in tables

More uniformity in tables would be useful. In some column are sorted with "newer" at the left and "older" at the right. In other is the other way. --87.15.151.110 (talk) 23:17, 4 August 2019 (UTC)