Talk:List of spider common names
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
linking of describers
[edit]describer links are totally ambiguous the way they are given here. they should be removed, and every distinct describer be linked once and only once. --Sarefo 03:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- ok, i changed that, but i think the list still needs work. maybe the species should be grouped according to family? Also, I'm not sure that the describer should be in the list. And i think maybe this list should not be in the main wikipedia at all, but maybe as a work list in the WP:SPI internal pages? --Sarefo 04:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
@Sarefo: I don't think we need the authorities at all here, so I've removed them. I've also updated the scientific names, as quite a few have changed since 2006. There's an issue with sourcing, though: any names not from the general source given should really be separately referenced. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on List of spider common names. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060927170756/http://www.americanarachnology.org/acn5.pdf to http://www.americanarachnology.org/acn5.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)