Talk:List of women's associations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

POV text, bad

This article begins with text that is written in a very un-encyclopedic style:

Women's associations fall under wide and diverse set of categories, yet they all have a unified goal - helping women.

It would be almost impossible to track history of the earliest women's association, but an endeavor can be made to list the most noteworthy organizations with a mission to help women in various sectors of their lives.

Please, help. Wikipedia is not meant for this kind of moralistic, subjective, point-of-view, rhetorical talking. --Paulbe (talk) 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Country-specific, without indication, very bad

The list seems to be very country-specific. The author is so bigoted that she/he does not even mention in which country all these "national" organisations exist. Because there are also three "American ... associations" on the list and the only one with a clear gographical indication is in Los Angeles, i presume that there are only organisations on this list that are limited to the USA. I as a wikipeidianisticalist, see problems here: The English language wikipedia is meant, as all language versions (in principle for all versions, but certainly for en, eo, fr, ar, es, de, pt and nl) to be not country-specific. And there really is not any clear indication that this list is about one country/state. The entries in the list have no indcation of geography or are "National" or are "American". Information for people from the USA (estadounidenses): the adjective "American" is not owned by the USA. --Paulbe (talk) 23:50, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]