Talk:Longview (British band)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Myspace link

Invalid User? Could this be removed/corrected? 86.42.13.123 13:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naming...

Say, isn't the wrong solution to rename the whole band just because it doesn't fit into the naming scheme? How about moving this thing to, say, Longview (indie band)? Tierlieb 20:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. Certainly at one time the band was using the hyphen due to a legal dispute, see example logo here: http://14thfloorrecords.groupee.net/eve/ubb.x?a=cfrm&s=2171034641&f=4591034641&c=4591034641

That said, as the hyphen was only added for legal reasons, I think it's fair to keep the hyphen in the title and use the band's "real" name in the rest of the article. Bobalo 29 October 2007.

Can I bring this back up again, I totally agree with Tierlieb. My first thought was move to Longview (British band), but anything is better than the current. You can't just stick a hyphen in the middle?! Alex9788 (talk) 11:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right; wikipedia doesn't change spellings to fit its own organizational scheme. Longview (British band) would fit perfectly. - DavidWBrooks 15:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Done, and removed the text in the article refering to a hyphen in the title. I will also remove the hyphen on the disambiguation page. Thanks for the response, Alex9788 (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a latecomer to this discussion, but does somebody want to sort out the Mercury page? At the moment it still has the band's name with a hyphen, the track listings are absent, and the "Subversions" wikilink just redirects to a disambig page for the word "subversion". I don't know the band's material too well, but I'm guessing that "Subversions" was a second disc of remixes? If so, it probably needs saying explicitly on that page, rather than what's currently there. Dom Kaos (talk) 16:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Longview have split

Longview have split up. It was confirmed by Rob McVey in a post on his facebook page here: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1605096563114306&id=1583402475283715. Also Rob has been working on his first solo album too, and he has posted demos on his own website: http://www.robertmcvey.uk/ Andrew07 (talk) 20:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]