Talk:Lovestoneites

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States History

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Establishing Notability

So, what, exactly, do I need to do to establish notability?--Dudeman5685 (talk) 20:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All the other parties listed on the International Communist Opposition page have pages for them.--Dudeman5685 (talk) 20:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In a nutshell, provide references to significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Take a look at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for more specific details. Wikipedia:Reliable sources has info on what is and is not considered reliable.--RadioFan (talk) 21:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved to Lovestoneites Lynch 7 04:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Party of the USA (Opposition) → Lovestoneites – Preceding unsigned comment added by Dudeman5685 (talk contribs) 21:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Qualified support: The entirety of the present article should be moved over to Lovestoneites since that is indeed the name by which this movement is known by most people. However there might be a place for a one-paragraph defining stub article under the present CPUSA (Opposition) label, telling the reader to find more information at Lovestoneites. —— Shakescene (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support: In most of the historical literature i have encountered, the group is reffered to by this name. If you look at their own literature, you will see that the name reflected a lot about how the group defined themselves, as a faction within the CPUSA, an opposition within the CPUSA, independent Communists and finally a trade union league that was virtually anti-communist. Having the main title one of these names gives undue weight to just one of its incarnations. We should keep the other names as redirect pages (thats actully why I had trouble moving it the first time)--Dudeman5685 (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I get 21 post-1980 English-language Google Book hits for "Communist Party of the USA (Opposition)", 1,600 for "Lovestoneites". The current title is just one of several official names the group had, and was used only briefly. It refers to Stalin's now-forgotten purge of the Bukharin-led Right Opposition (not to Trotsky), so few modern readers will catch the meaning. Kauffner (talk) 10:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - While I ordinarily dislike reducing movements to the name of a single individual (imagine, for example, the history of the United Farm Workers make into "Chavezites"), in this case the four organizational names in a short period of time combined with the common use of "Lovestoneites" in the literature makes a legitimate case here. There should remain a redirect for the current title, of course. Lovestoneites is apt to be the search term, for better or worse. Carrite (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Pro forma COI declaration

I've got a book out now from the Dutch academic publisher Brill that I'll be listing in Further Reading. I just wanted to call attention to my real name and screen name so that the connection is clear. —Tim Davenport /// Carrite (talk) 04:53, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]