Talk:Luke O'Neill (scientist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Removal?

This revert claims that information was removed by switching templates. However, on examination, it appears that no inappropriate removal ensued; the switch largely reduced redundancy and improved accessibility. The two exceptions were Strangeways, which was a postdoctoral position only, and the |awards= parameter - the PhD is not an "award" as we usually consider them, and similarly EMBO is a membership rather than a typical "award". Happy to hear opinions on how best to approach representation of the EMBO issue. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Duncan.Hull: You must have missed this query about |awards= - how do you think we should represent EMBO? Nikkimaria (talk) 15:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter references - Ivor Cummins

There are two references using links to the twitter account of Ivor Cummins, whose views are WP:FRINGE. Are there reliable sources that can be used instead? WP:TWITTER limits usage of Twitter as a reference - in particular it says it can be used it does not involve claims about third parties; and it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;. However, given those restrictions thy cannot be used in this article. Autarch (talk) 03:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Autarch: I agree. I was very surprised to see this video mentioned at all in the article, while at the same time his work during the COVID-19 pandemic has barely been discussed at all. I don't see how this video is even relevant to this article and looks like someone trying to push a certain agenda. Oisin1001 (talk) 22:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]