Jump to content

Talk:M-77 (Michigan highway)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleM-77 (Michigan highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 5, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Assessment

[edit]

The article's history is too short to merit B-class. CL02:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Short of inventing history, it has all of the history available. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As the master of assessors Keiryn once told me, some articles just never will get to B-class; just because the information isn't present doesn't mean it doesn't exist. M-77 still has a history, albeit a poorly-documented one. So, out of curiosity, MDOT doesn't have a page of history for all its routes like UDOT does? CL20:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, it doesn't. And the last time I asked for information about a highway through FOIA, MDOT quoted me a price tag of a grand for the research time for stuff on M-28. In the case of M-77, it was assigned. It was paved. It had a section straightened. It still exists. If you think that's a small history, see M-67. Imzadi1979 (talk) 21:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well in any case, Algorerhythms has already reassessed. I think the problem is UTSH has its B-class standards too high. That, or I'm just making excuses as to why you guys are first in the scale CL02:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on M-77 (Michigan highway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]