Talk:MER-6A Emergency Rocket Communications System

United States: Nebraska / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Nebraska portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of MER-6A Emergency Rocket Communications System was copied or moved into Scout (rocket family) with this edit on 2020-04-30. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Lesser duplicate of AN/DRC-8 Emergency Rocket Communications System?[edit]

I'm inclined to put this up for AfD, as it lacks any content that isn't also (word for word, nearly) in AN/DRC-8_Emergency_Rocket_Communications_System. It should at the very least link to the other (alright, I'll do that), but deletion or redirection seem like a more sensible option to me. I'm not familiar with the subject, figured I'd ask here first: anyone want to expand the article or at least explain why it should exist? Barometz (talk) 17:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On closer inspection it seems like MER-6A ERCS is something of a misnomer for the entire project - the [[DRC-8 Emergency_Rocket Communications System#Chronology[6]|chronology]] over at the other article refers to MER-6A as a type of Blue Scout rocket. All mention of MER-6A that I can find is unsourced, so it may take someone with knowledge of relevant sources to verify this? Barometz (talk) 17:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]