Talk:MS Stockholm (1941)

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 3, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Italy's Cantieri Riuniti dell' Adriatico shipyard built two ocean liners named MS Stockholm for the Swedish American Line between 1936 and 1941, neither of which operated commercially?

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / German / Italian / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

What is with the numbering in this article?

Four ships are described. But the third one is said to be "the second Stockholm," and then it is further described as "markedly similar to the second Stockholm." ??? I can think of a couple of ways of clarifying things based on just the information in the article, but I prefer to wait for comments on here before doing anything, since there may be conventions I'm not aware of. Thanks. --Tkynerd 14:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another point about the SS Stockholm (II) is that the article says she was "launched," but that she burned while under construction. If her construction was never finished, she could never have been launched. Does "launched" refer to when her keel was laid, and if so, does that apply to the other ships as well? --Tkynerd 01:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Launching" refers to the launching of a ship from drydock into water, which usually occurs in midst of the building process, when the hull has been completed but before outfitting begins. It does not refer to the ship being completed and entering service. -- Kjet (talk · contribs) 15:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stub-class?

I don't think this article is a stub, so I have removed the stub templates from it. I particularly do not wish to see the TV-related stub templates restored, as this is not a TV-related article in any meaningful sense. --Tkynerd 14:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MS Stockholm (1941). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080309012952/http://www.salship.se/timeline.asp to http://www.salship.se/timeline.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MS Stockholm (1941). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080309012905/http://www.salship.se/stock3.asp to http://www.salship.se/stock3.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

this article is needlessly complicated

(title) IonlyPlayz2 (talk) 14:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]