Jump to content

Talk:MT Varzuga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First Western ship

[edit]

I have removed the following claim

In 1997 Uikku became the first Western ship to navigate the entire Northern Sea Route since the expedition by Adolf Erik Nordenskiöld in 1878.

as it is probably incorrect. Gabriel Kielland (talk) 09:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uikku's journey through the North Sea Route has been widely reported as being the first made by a Western oil tanker, for example a recent article by The Finnish Seamen's Union claims that "The M/t Uikku was the first Western oil tanker to navigate the entire Northern Sea Route", BarentsObserver.com writes that "Then, in autumn 1997, the Uikku sailed the entire Northeast Passage, the first Finnish and Western trade vessel to do so, fetching a cargo of diesel from Provideniya Bay", there's an article by Lawson W. Brigham, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge that contains a sentence "...tanker Uikku, became the first western merchant ship to transit the entire NSR..." (but it can not be accessed with Google for free) and there's a paper by Dynamic Positioning Committee says that "In 1997 Uikku became the first western cargo ship to navigate through the North-east Sea route". Perhaps "the first Western ship" was too much of a generalization - "first Western merchant ship" or "first Western oil tanker" could've been more accurate? I think this should be mentioned in the article whether or not it is actually true as everyone seems to be talking about it - either "Uikku was the first" or "Uikku is often reported as being the first, but...", of course with appropriate sources etc. Do you have any suggestions about how it should be done, assuming that the articles I listed can be used as sources? Tupsumato (talk) 13:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Uikku was hired for the voyage by a joint venture company[1] making the western/eastern dichotomy less clear. How about this:
In 1997 Uikku became the first merchant ship under non-soviet flag to navigate the entire Northern Sea Route Gabriel Kielland (talk) 22:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds good. Will you make the necessary changes to the article? Tupsumato (talk) 03:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Done. Gabriel Kielland (talk) 22:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I reverted the edit which removed the link to the azimuth thruster brand from the lead. The conversion of Uikku was an important milestone in the development of the Azipod concept, not azimuth thrusters in general. However, I changed the wording somewhat.

Furthermore, there is no need to link common units such as kilowatts and megawatts.

Tupsumato (talk) 20:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on MT Varzuga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]