Talk:Machine-readable dictionary

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

[Untitled]

I'm suggesting merging this article with Electronic Dictionary.Kudpung (talk) 10:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

self-advertising

It appears to me that the article has been used as a pretext to advertise the "Gellish dictionary". And that is definitely wrong, because that "dictionary" of an artificial language has little to do with the kind of problems faced by compilers of machine dictionaries for real natural languages. It is disappointing that Wikipedia hosts a separate article on that and allows the author to spread his plugs throughout other articles, like this one. 193.0.65.67 (talk) 18:26, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]