Talk:Make Trade Fair

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I will be adding details of MTF at the recent WTO meeting in HK. Busy...arrggh --Madchester 01:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone should write a commentary on the economic ramifications and consequences of Make Trade Fair policies and aims. -- X444 18:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MakeTradeFairStipe.jpg

Image:MakeTradeFairStipe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxfam

This is a biased viewpoint and does not fairly describe Make Trade Fair.

The article has all the hallmarks of a person working for Oxfam, trying to get over thier "brand". Oh how sick I am of agencies jockying for position of thier brands - this is not an Oxfam campaign, it's a coalition of a number of agencies and individual grass-roots campaigners and activists and should be amended to fairly reflect this. Any comments please? Justiceandpeace (talk) 23:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC) Justiceandpeace[reply]

Well, this campaign is indeed organized by Oxfam. Of course, there are other organizations promoting fair trade, but this specific campaign is an Oxfam one. --Erwin (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Make Trade Fair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]