Talk:Mano (character)
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This page was proposed for deletion by TTN (talk · contribs) on 20 December 2019. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I'm going to try and tackle this. Frankly Mano hasn't done anything worth mentioning for a while - he hasn't been seen since Our Worlds at War and THAT was a hologram... so the article needs to be a little less stubby but not updated so much. Korvac 17:36, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- Uh, I am a huge Legion fan. I picked up Superboy and the Legion of Superheroes #209 off the rack at cover price the day it came out. That's how old I am. BUT, I don't think Mano deserves his own article. I'm not even sure that the Fatal 5 are THAT important. However, I'd like to help condense them if you want to create a thorough Fatal 5 article. That should be good enough, right? leesonma June 17, 2006
I agree that Mano shouldn't have his own Wiki article as he's almost never seen without the other five and very little is known about him. On the other hand, the Five ARE the Legion's greatest foes and as such do deserve their own team entry. If that entry gets too big, then splitting it off into individual ones would be justified. Wilfredo Martinez 17:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Also: Mano doesn't cause things to explode when he touches them, he disintegrates them. That was the reason he was wearing a spacesuit when he destroyed his home planet- to survive in the resulting vacuum in space. I doubt he would have survived an explosion of planetary level as he is not invulnerable. (I assume he must've had someone pick him up afterwards, as he can't fly, either.) The rebooting of this should be pointed out. Wilfredo Martinez 17:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:ManoFatalFive.jpg
[edit]Image:ManoFatalFive.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.