Talk:Marion Turner

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that a photograph be added to this article to improve its quality.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

11 references for book authorship

Hello Beccaynr. I agree with user Scope Creep that the 11 sources supporting that the subject authored a book are not an improvement to the article. Please obtain consensus here first, instead of reverting the edit yet again. If you would like to work on this aspect of the article in the meantime, you can use your Sandbox. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MrsSnoozyTurtle, As I have tried to explain, the references were never added to indicate book authorship, but are reviews added to allow expansion of the article [1], [2]. I also do not understand why you reverted my placement of the in use template, [3], which I added to indicate that I was going to work with the sources in the article, to create the critical reception section. I am going to add the template again, and continue making my revisions to the article, as I said I would. I am concerned about why you would repeatedly delete independent and reliable sources, that were clearly not simply added to indicate book authorship, and especially after I indicated I was about to immediately work with them to improve the article. Adding reviews is a noncontroversial addition to author articles, so I do not see any need for my sandbox nor to obtain consensus about creating a new section. Beccaynr (talk) 02:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Beccaynr. As I replied, the purpose of sources is to support text currently within the article, not to speculate of possible future article contents.
The reason I removed the in-use template is that the Sandbox is the appropriate place to develop the text in this situation, rather than reverting again to your preferred version and then WP:STONEWALLING by putting an in-use tag on the article.
The real issue, now seen on multiple articles, is your tactic of repeatedly insta-reverting any edit you disagree with, even while Talk Page discussions are ongoing. This is disrespectful to fellow editors and is not in accordance with WP:BATTLEGROUND. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beccaynr, following your fifth revert, I give up on this article. Congratulations, your underhanded tactics have successfully prevented any collaboration on this article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WTRMT

I misspelled WP:WTRMT, the link to the how-to guide on when to remove templates, in my edit summary [4] after previously linking correctly, [5], so I wanted to make sure the link is clear. I am referring to sections 6 and 3, for further clarification. Beccaynr (talk) 23:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]