Talk:Mark Gilmartin

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not notable IMO

My first thought was to either apply the COI template or attempt to remove the "peacocking and puffery." However, after reading the full article, the Notability template seems more appropriate.

Virtually all of the content was added by one user (Joyprice7) on a handful of dates in 2011, 2013, and 2015. That user has no other activity or profile.

The sources are skimpy, e.g. a 3-minute TV interview, a 1-sentence quote in the Washington Post. And there have been no new sources added nor any non-trivial edits made to the article since Joyprice7 apparently lost interest in 2015.

So, it appears that nobody has ever had anything to contribute about this subject except (probably) the subject himself, and even he hasn't bothered to make any further edits in the last 9 years. I'd vote for "not notable" and deletion. Juan603 (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]