Talk:Martin Gottlieb
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
No COI, neutral point of view and secondary sources listed. I thanked orangemike for his diligence but believe that the charges asserted for blocking the account(loebfellow) come from my incompetence with Wikipedia not from malfeasance. I do not work for Gottlieb, nor Loeb (was enthusiastic loebfellow hence the name.) After reading an article about the shortage of women participating on wikipedia, I decided to give it a go. I have expertise in a number of areas that might be of interest to Wikipedia users. There is no bias, no paid relationship with subject, his publisher (?),or with Loeb. Just a series of bumbling learning curve mistakes. This is why I made so many entries (largely to correct Wikipedia spacing and sourcing issues. I can understand orangemike's worry that the trail was a mile long..) What you noticed was sheer incompetence on my part. I am clearly not a nimble enough participant but do hope that you'll read the text to see that there is no COI and that secondary sources are used. Thank you.(Pixstories (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2013 (UTC))
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Martin Gottlieb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009174915/http://humanities.princeton.edu/journalism/faculty.html to http://humanities.princeton.edu/journalism/faculty.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)