Talk:Martyrs (2008 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

In the Teaser on the DVD it is shown that this film ist rated 16+ in France -- 78.49.76.126 (talk) 00:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

The plot reads like it's been copied from some promotional material or other, I think it needs to be changed to something more neutral.80.229.225.16 (talk) 23:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. I like when the plot is described in a detailed manner. The more detail the better. I would rather see more information in articles than less. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.251.227.210 (talk) 01:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the article as it was on the 12th April, when the Plot summary was very much like something you would read as a blurb or in promotional material, not a description of the plot of the movie. As it is now it is more of a description of the film. We now have the opposite problem, however, as it is too long and detailed and needs trimmed down a bit.80.229.225.16 (talk) 23:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely feel this should be trimmed down. I came to this page to try and actually find out what this film is about. Obviously it is useful to me because I can either read nothing about the plot, or have specific plot elements spoiled. It seems ridiculous to me that Wikipedia movie and book pages are turning into a plot retelling service rather than a place to actually find a concise, non-spoiling synopsis. How is the current mentality useful at all as an encyclopedia? These detailed descriptions are the purview of specialized sites. 67.180.89.34 (talk) 00:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The plot sumary states that the operators of the experiments were working with "the baseless belief" - should the word baseless be removed? I did not feel that the experimenters felt that it was a baseless belief. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.200.87 (talk) 17:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lucie's "creature"

i dont go with the opinion, that lucies creature is a manifestation of the girl she left behind when she was a child. i think its much more a manifestation of her own felt torture and pain. much like a borderline personality or an eating disordered person referres to its illness as "a voice that is telling me to do bad things to myself" probably it all comes together, and the girl she left behind was the triggering factor. still, i think the demon is lucie herself and her inner pain.

(sry my bad engish, im austrian ;)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.117.153.195 (talk • contribs)

The director has confirmed this interpretation, and it's pretty clear in the film, with Lucie repeatedly saying something to the extent of "I killed them for you, etc".--CyberGhostface (talk) 00:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

18+ certificate in France

Is it certain that the film received an 18+ cert, or an -18 cert which means that absolutely no-one under 18 can see the film? -18 is usually reserved for extremely violent or sexually orientated films. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.255.125.120 (talk) 16:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It did but they appealed it and got a 16+.--CyberGhostface (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Divisive [sic]"?

In Todd Brown's quote in the Reception section, why is "divisive" given a "sic"? It's not spelled wrong. Starvinsky (talk) 03:30, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Martyrs (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081011102035/http://fredambroisine.com/videos/080903martyrsE.htm to http://fredambroisine.com/videos/080903martyrsE.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]