Talk:Maryland Renaissance Festival

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reenactment (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reenactment, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ReenactmentWikipedia:WikiProject ReenactmentTemplate:WikiProject ReenactmentReenactment articles

Refimprove Template

While more content and sources will make these article better, I believe it is appropriate to remove this template now. Wiki publius 03:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concur, I removed it. --GregU 10:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crownsville or Annapolis?

Sorry if this is nitpicky. The festival maintains a P.O. box in Crownsville. The festival grounds are outside of any incorporated or census-designated place, but within the 21401 zip code of Annapolis. So which is it? I would vote for Annapolis since that is the best match for the location, but I won't change anything myself, since the festival itself uses Crownsville. This came up because I've been editing the Anne Arundel County page, and there I say it is "near Annapolis."--Bardobro (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2014 protest

I've significantly cut down the text on the protest. This was done for two main reasons: sourcing and linkspam. Linking to PETA, e-newsletters, and take action pages all count as primary sources, which should not be used in this context; secondary sources are much more preferred. To that end, really only the Look To The Stars article is acceptable as a source. The wn.com link is just a reprint of PETA's press release, so it doesn't count as an additional source. I've also removed it from its own section per WP:WEIGHT. Also, jamming the article full of links to the protest page feels like a cheap way around the linkfarm policy. The point of Wikipedia is not to drive traffic to the protest pages. I'd like to see a secondary source that can demonstrate the other organizations before we start naming them directly, but looking around, I'm not sure what we're gonna get. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 01:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've put back in the reference to the Capital Gazette's coverage of the protests, which is a secondary source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freeranging intellect (talk • contribs) 12:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've edited the text to reflect what the sources say - in this case, that only Born Free USA also protested. We can't say "other groups" because the sources don't say it. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]