Jump to content

Talk:Mazyr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unnamed sections

[edit]

Should be renamed to Mozyr. Altaveron (talk) 14:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why in section "Population" is only Jewish listed? What about Russian or Polish minority and especially about total pop? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.77.107.138 (talk) 04:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mazyr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mazyr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested edit of a Ukrainian claim of a false flag

[edit]

Opening a talk about following second revert without starting a talk. I suggested a talk, but, despite adding a second source, instead got a second revert (a third revert is edit warring). To avoid bogging down in discussion, I try to understand the reverter's concerns, and attempt a new edit that reasonably addresses some aspect of those concerns, specifically that that edit does not belong in the lead. Robertiki (talk) 22:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a news ticker (see WP:NOTNEWS). There are plenty of false flag claims that get thrown around so just because the claim itself is verifiable, it does not mean it belongs here. See also WP:ONUS. If you really want to try to include this somewhere, there are plenty of articles about the war. Since you do not have consensus for this, I would suggest to self-revert. Mellk (talk) 23:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An RfC is unnecessary. What you should have done, if you really insist on it, is to continue discussing and then go through WP:3O. Either way, you still do not have consensus. Mellk (talk) 16:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"If you are able to come to a consensus ... then there is no need to start an RfC." You stated three times the same position, albeit my changes, so I understand that you are rock solid against any compromise. Am I wrong ? So I think we need other comments about what is to include or not. Like here. --Robertiki (talk) 18:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have given you arguments based on policy as to why it does not belong in this article. I am not sure why you linked the other article, does it contain false flag claims? Either way, it is not relevant. You still have not addressed this, you just jumped straight to a RfC, which is a waste of time. When and if the city does get bombed, then it can be mentioned. Mellk (talk) 18:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the claimed target is an oil refinery, which is located outside the city, so it makes no sense to mention it here. Mellk (talk) 18:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Ukrainian claim of a false flag

[edit]

Should the Ukraine’s security service claim about Russia preparing to stage a “false flag” attack at Mazyr oil refinery be mentioned in the Mazyr page ? Robertiki (talk) 09:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, not yet. Nothing has happened.Mwinog2777 (talk) 23:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It can be covered if it ever becomes an important part of Mazyr's history, not just the larger Russian war effort. Senorangel (talk) 00:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, not relevant enough Marcelus (talk) 07:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mazyr&oldid=1203933979"