Talk:Mbaqanga

Mbaqanga is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles

Africa: Lesotho / South Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Lesotho.
	South Africa portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Africa (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Much work needed! For a start, there was irony in naming it after porridge made from maize, or in South African English, mealies. This also has the meaning of easily-made bland everyday pap. The Lawless One (talk) 22:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this article needs a lot of attention. I am putting a NPOV template on it (for several reasons; it's not hard to pick them out), and hopefully someone who has some more information about mbaqanga can come fix it... Unfortunately I don't know enough myself, but I do know that this music had a ressurgence in post-apartheid South Africa, which isn't mentioned at all in the article. Anyone? --Romarin 18:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the article has a non-neutral perspective, it just seems to be relying on old sources of information. Hence it talks about Mbaqanga being "rural music" which became popular in the 1950s and then died down. I believe it needs to be updated, explaining the resurgence of this music in the 1980s, as well as during the post-apartheid era (from 1994 onwards). I am sorry that I am not able to do this myself because I don't have the depth of knowledge required to flesh it out properly. --Anonymous 19:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the POV to a more neutral style and added post-apartheid references. DocDee 18:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

................... Comment -

This article is somewhat one sided politically. The growth of the genre was largely due to the radio station Radio Zulu who pumped it mercilessly in the 1970s and 80s. So ironically the apartheid system, through its "tribal" radio policy was responsible, at least partly for its success. Genre like Jazz and Blues suffered on these stations. Mbaquanga is not Jazz! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.241.25.240 (talk) 16:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mbaqanga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206233758/http://www.southafrica.info/ess_info/sa_glance/culture/922565.htm to http://www.southafrica.info/ess_info/sa_glance/culture/922565.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]