Talk:Medical astrology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Astrology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Stormyruiz.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I came across Astrology and health on new page patrol today, and it seems to fit best within the framework of this page. I know nothing about the subject; hope someone familiar with it would undertake a merge. Thanks. Maralia (talk) 03:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

not so Moon, but Neptune's

i'd edit this myself.. but you know..i dont/didnt wanna make things 'visibly' worst, however....

listing the lymphatic system w/ the Moon is highly incorrect.. note that it 'LS' is associated w/ the sign of Pisces.. it's well known Neptune is associated w/ Pisces, we in the med-astro field, associate the lymphatic system w/ Neptune, NOT the Moon... plz correct. oh and Pluto – elimination, is then associated w/ the large intestines. plz add same. thanx! 2602:304:CDAF:A3D0:500B:2775:7B2A:33F (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudoscience?

Methinks it's a pseudoreligion!

I'd be careful, if I were you, about excessively swinging the pseudoscience hatched because it might wear out. 67.206.183.155 (talk) 08:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical astrology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090318140638/http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/astrology.html to http://www.americanhumanist.org/about/astrology.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical astrology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070610032218/http://www.zodiacal.com/articles/hand/history.htm to http://www.zodiacal.com/articles/hand/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melothesia separate article

Right now there is a redirection of "melothesia" to this article, but melothesia quite exceeds the boundaries of medical astrology. It is a name for the macrocosm—microcosm correspondence, right? As such it is rather cosmological and it has remarkable parallelisms in Indian, Chinese and other traditional cosmologies. Can you think of objections to starting a separate article? Cheers, Desde la Torre (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, write the article. It's still a pseudoscience and any new article should make that perfectly clear. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 21:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]