Talk:Melbourne Symphony Orchestra

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Australia: Melbourne / Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Melbourne Symphony Orchestra is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Originally called Victorian Symphony Orchestra

I think we need to state that is was called the VSO until around the late 40s-early 50s, but I'm having trouble establishing a firm date for the name change. It may even have had a different name in Zelman's time. Can anyone help? -- JackofOz (talk) 03:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a date for name change to MSO. According to an extract from "Crescendo: Melbourne Symphony Orchestra: Celebrating 100 Years", by Stella M. Barber, published in Limelight (September 2007), the MSO was called the VSO between 1948 and 1964. -- JackofOz (talk) 09:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This link says the relevant years were 1949 and 1965. We should try to pin this down more exactly if possible. -- JackofOz (talk) 03:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]