Talk:Methyl carbamate
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Regulation in alcoholic beverages
[edit]I think levels of this chemical are regulated in alcoholic beverages but information is hard to find. Any editors who are familiar with this, could you please add information about this? Many thanks, Badagnani 07:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- Where does is say that methyl carbamate is found in wine etcetera? There are references for N-methyl carbamates (which is are breakdown products of carbamate insecticides). Dr Zak 12:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Carcinogenic or not
[edit]According to the rules for California it is carcinogenic, it is important to understand that califonia has its own rules which are stricter than the rest of the US. Also the compound gave a negative result in the Ames test.Cadmium
- Its close relative urethane is genuinely mutagenic, so one ought to exaercise caution. Dr Zak 12:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- True Dr Zak, it is best to be prudent when making the choice as to expose or not expose one's self. I have some grave misgivings about the chemical scorecard web site, it looks rather like a NGO rather than a definiative source of data. I have noticed that other web sites consider the title compound not to be a carcinogen in man.
- I think that if we are not careful about the use of the label carcinogen then it will lose its meaning, the term should be applied to substances where a clear link is known either in animals or man. Examples would include BeO, soot, benzene, 2-aminonapthalene and cisplatin. I know that ethanol is over consumed by a human can increase the chance of some cancers but ethanol is not a carcinogen.Cadmium
- I couldn't agree more about there being different degrees of carcinogenity. What is worse is that lists like the California P65 lists don't distinguish between the really serious carcinogens and the merely suspected ones.
- But that wasn't what I had in mind at all, instead I was thinking about the mutagenic potential of methyl carbamate. Apparently ethyl carbamate has been shown to be a mutagen in the Ames test while methyl carbamate tested negative. I can't think why they should react different, so maybe under certain conditions methyl carbamate is mutagenic, too.
- (Hopefully my mast edit to the article page makes clear that this is not a proven carcinogen but a weekly suspected one). Dr Zak 16:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Methyl carbamate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060512183340/http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/files/P65single20306.pdf to http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/files/P65single20306.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)