Jump to content

Talk:Metropolitan Water Board (London)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Area of the Board

[edit]

The area described is much larger than that which the MWB served in the 1960s (it did not serve large parts of Middlesex), it appears to be that of the (much more recent) Thames Water Authority. Were the boundaries reduced between 1902 and privatisation? --MBRZ48 16:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That may have been my misinterpretation of the schedules to the Act (which I found hard to understand). Thames Water had a much larger area out to Wiltshire. For the record, the urban districts and boroughs that contributed members (and presumably were within the limits of Supply) were:
  • Essex: Buckhurst Hill, Chingford, Leyton, Waltham Holy Cross, Wanstead, Woodford
  • Kent: Beckenham, Bromley, Erith, Penge, Bexley, Dartford, Chislehurst, Foots Cray
  • Middlesex: Ealing, Acton, Chiswick, Hampton Wick, Sunbury, Hampton, Hanwell, Brentford, Teddington, Twickenham, Heston & Isleworth, Edmonton, Enfield, Southgate, Hornsey, Wood Green, Tottenham
  • Surrey:Kingston, Wimbledon, Barnes, Surbiton, Esher & the Dittons, East and West Molesey, Maldens and Coombe, Ham
  • Hertfordshire: part of Cheshunt
  • The county boroughs of East Ham and West Ham
  • Croydon county borough was not in the MWB area.
...........
My suspicion is that the very big area might have been where the MWB was responsible for Drainage but not always for supply. The W/N/NW parts of Middlesex were supplied by private water companies (actually public trusts) from no later than the 1960s until they were flogged off by the Iron Maiden to the "big boys" of the water world. The drainage work had passed to the GLC but I don't recall whose vehicles lurked above the sewers in pre-GLC days. Unfortunately the current water companies' websites seem to be lacking historical information and I suspect an expedition to the London Metropolitan Archives (or the PRO?) might be needed to dig up the information.--MBRZ48 04:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as Middlesex is concerned, the following urban districts existed in 1903, but were not included, which should give some idea of the boundary: Friern Barnet, Feltham, Finchley, Greenford, Harrow on the Hill, Hendon, Kingsbury, Southall-Norwood, Staines, Uxbridge, Wealdstone, Wembley, Willesden Lozleader 17:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops! I missed that bit. That does indeed hint that "modern" Middlesex was left out of the 1903 area, as it seems to match the territories of the Colne Valley Water Co. and the Rickmansworth and Uxbridge Valley Water Co. Possibly this was because their catchment area was in Herts and Bucks and too far from the Thames ? MBRZ48 04:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Board area in 1939

[edit]

I have a map of the board area in 1939. It is as follows:

  • County of London
  • Middlesex: Enfield*, Southgate, Edmonton, Wood Green, Tottenham, Hornsey, Hendon (part), Willesden (part), Ealing (part), Acton, Brentford and Chiswick, Southall (part), Heston and Isleworth (part), Feltham (part), Sunbury-on-Thames (part)
  • Hertfordshire: Cheshunt, Ware (part), Hertford (part), Hoddesdon, Ware RD (part), Hertford RD (part)
  • Surrey: Barnes, Richmond, Kingston-upon-Thames, Malden and Coombe, Wimbledon, Surbiton, Esher, Merton and Morden (part), Mitcham, Croydon (part)
  • Kent: Penge, Beckenham, Bromley, Chislehurst and Sidcup, Bexley, Erith, Crayford, Dartford, Swanscombe, Dartford RD (part), Orpington, Sevenoaks RD* (part)
  • Essex: Waltham Holy Cross, Chigwell, Ongar RD (part), Chingford, Walthamstow, Leyton, West Ham, East Ham, Wanstead and Woodford, Romford* (part), Ilford*, Barking*, Dagenham*
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metropolitan Water Board (London). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New River Company Shares

[edit]

In the volume Metropolitan Water Board: The Water Supply of London referenced on page 7 it states that the MWB, as successor to the New River Company, still paying (in 1961) 1500 annuities in respect of the NRC's waterwheels on old London Bridge.

What became of these shares? Jackiespeel (talk) 11:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]