Talk:Michael Putland
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Reads like an ad, lacks good sources
[edit]Just sayin' --Nuujinn (talk) 01:42, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Just agreeing. -- Hoary (talk) 07:54, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Not credible
[edit]The only reason why I don't add Template:Cite check to this is that Rusf10 has just added Template:Unreliable sources to it.
Why add one or other of these templates? See Talk:Janette Beckman#Not credible. -- Hoary (talk) 01:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Michael Putland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080405003952/http://www.blog.zoozoom.com/zoozoom/2005/07/culture_michael.aspx to http://www.blog.zoozoom.com/zoozoom/2005/07/culture_michael.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080120033646/http://gallery2.redferns.com/gallery_text/photographer_biographies/michael_putland_biog.htm to http://gallery2.redferns.com/gallery_text/photographer_biographies/michael_putland_biog.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228082238/http://www.10theclash.com/ to http://10theclash.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Not credible (ii)
[edit]I've gone through the article, removing bogus sources and clearing up in other ways. This before-and-after comparison is hard to digest, so I recommend looking at my edit summaries (in the article history).
The result mostly lacks specific sources. Perhaps one or two among the external links listed at the foot of the article will serve as sources for some of this material. -- Hoary (talk) 13:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)