This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Is there any reason the list of books by Foucault is headed "Monographs" rather than "Books"? Note that a later section is called "Other Books" rather than "Other Monographs." Apart from being pretentious, the term is inaccurate when applied to several of Foucault's very wide-ranging, broad examinations of topics like madness, the clinic, punishment, and the history of sexuality. A book-length study of discourse about sexuality and marriage in the 18th Century might well be a monograph. It's one of several topics in one chapter for Foucault. Monographs are precisely not wide-ranging surveys of subject areas.KD Tries Again (talk) 05:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)KD Tries Again[reply]
