Jump to content

Talk:Microcystin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Why isn't there an entry for how this sort of contamination is cleared from a municipal water distribution network? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.146.80.57 (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please make more accessible for a general audience

[edit]

I came here today driven by the stories about the water crisis in Ohio. I agree with the poster who asked for something specific on this issue in the entry, but wanted to add a broader point.

I believe this article is hard to follow and understand for anyone without professional-level engagement or knowledge of this field. Since I am a journalist who has covered sci-tech topics for educated but non-specialist audiences since the 1970s, and for nearly a decade was in charge of a weekly sci-tech TV show, I think I am probably one of the non-specialists most likely to understand an entry on this subject. Yet I found it very inaccessible:

"Microcystins are cyclic nonribosomal peptides produced by cyanobacteria (e.g., Microcystis aeruginosa and Planktothrix). They are cyanotoxins and can be very toxic for plants and animals including humans. Their hepatotoxicity may cause serious damage to the liver. Microcystins can strongly inhibit protein phosphatases type 1 (PP1) and 2A (PP2A), and are linked to pansteatitis.[1]"

This is the written in the style of what I imagine might be an answer to a question on a college test, not an encyclopedia entry even for a college-educated general public. It is almost like someone showing off, bragging about how much they know. Obviously that was not the case since to all intents and purposes Wikipedia contributions are anonymous. I think it is likely that the author(s) were not focusing on writing for a general audience. For example, right after the mention of cyanobacteria two specific organisms are cited. This would show a teacher that one is familiar with the field being studied; but the member of the general public that isn't quite sure what a "cyanobacteria" is would be more helped if inside the parenthesis it said "these are bacteria that derive their energy from photosynthesis, for example blue-green algae."

It is not my intention to denigrate the efforts nor intentions of the volunteers who worked on this entry. It is obviously much better to have this entry rather than nothing at all, but if someone who knows enough about the field to do so would make the entry a little less reliant on readers already knowing all this professional language, that would be a significant improvement. Jgperez (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The technical parts have been reduced or moved to a sub-section. prokaryotes (talk) 11:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microcystin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Microcystin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Florida algal blooms

[edit]

It is absurd not having a section on this. Microcystin is the effect of pollution coming into Lake Okeechobee and is responsible for the toxicity of algal blooms throughout Florida

http://fdep.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8af74a0a2de643bca3a58ad28989a30d

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Microcystin&oldid=1195509398"