Jump to content

Talk:Microscopium in Chinese astronomy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

either it should be merged to article microscopium or it should be deleted. Lacks informationSehmeet singh (talk) 09:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The purpose of these articles is to build a cross-reference of ancient Chinese star patterns (or asterisms) to that of the 88 modern constellations. As you can imagine, the star patterns are quite different. I think this is a useful resource that should stand alone. It'll be very disruptive to merge this content into the main constellation articles, especially for the larger constellations. I agree that the articles DO need a lot of work, but they should neither be deleted nor merged. BW95 (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Andromeda (Chinese astronomy) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Microscopium in Chinese astronomy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]