Talk:Midbrain activation

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on December 29, 2016. The result of the discussion was delete.

Categorisation?

Does it make sense to include this under Category:Supernatural healing? Please suggest/add any other relevant categories that this article fill fit into. Chaos1618 (talk) 14:07, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. Why would this question even arise when the article gives no indication that healing has anything to do with this? Largoplazo (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Largoplazo Midbrain activation also considerably delves into healing. The courses claim relief from anxiety, stress etc. An alternate name for Midbrain activation is also pineal gland healing. But admittedly these are not strongly and directly related to the main topic. How about we include it in Category:Pseudoscience? Chaos1618 (talk) 15:50, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categories shouldn't be assigned on the basis of properties that aren't mentioned in the article. They shouldn't be the primary way by which Wikipedia provides a particular piece of information about a topic. For example, you wouldn't categorize a biographical article under Category:Catholics unless the person's Catholicism was mentioned in the article. Category:Pseudoscience, yes, certainly.Largoplazo (talk) 16:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks Largoplazo. I've added Category:Pseudoscience to the article now. Chaos1618 (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More sources

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] —Paleo Neonate – 19:33, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]