Talk:Mile run

Athletics High‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Running High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Untitled

Why are the two examples of men and women runner at the bottom both white and from Britain? Seems kind of odd/biased towards this country? 38.88.5.50 (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just commenting, not defending (I didn't put in the pictures and we are limited to what is available in the wiki library, this is just how wikipedia works): Men) El Guerrouj is already pictured above in the article. Ngeny essentially got on the list by finishing second to El Guerrouj and never was on top, kind of inappropriate to put him there. OK, maybe someone could put Morcelli in, but frankly the picture on his page doesn't look that good. Feel free to edit it in if you think it is better, or discuss here. Cram is 4th on the list and held the record for a decade, though his is not an action photo. Women) Masterkova only has a beauty photo, no action photo in the wikipedia library. The others that follow her don't have pictures. O'Sullivan is the first one on the list to have a decent photo. And she is Irish, not a Brit . . . Trackinfo (talk) 16:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oceania record

I'm posing this for Montel, who monitors this page. Nick Willis ran 3:51.61 in Boston see here. I don't know what kind of ratification for an Oceana area indoor record might be. Should we post this as pending? Trackinfo (talk) 02:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trackinfo. Oceania Athletics Association publishs the current list of ratified area records just on 1 January of each year. When an Area Record has been ratified, the Oceania Association informs the athlete’s National Federation and the IAAF. IAAF lists Willis' time now as an Oceanian record, see [1]. So it's supposed to be ratified. Montell 74 (talk) 07:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So just how long is a mile ?

Before we discuss why the IAAF gets this wrong, can we at least have a source showing that they do get in wrong? Can the person who added this please provide a source? Or someone else. 91.125.21.84 (talk) 12:20, 11 March 2017 (UTC)skennett[reply]

"exactly 1,609.344 metres, but considered by the IAAF to be 1,609.32 metres". Huh ? Where do they get 1,609.32 ? Assuming they run on a 400 metre track, do they pull the start line back 9.?? metres before the finish line i.e. before the first turn ? This article needs to discuss the issues of running non-metric events on metric tracks. IRcbutcher (talk) 11:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where they get to round it to 1609.32. I use 1609.35, the rounding error to the disfavor of the athlete. But to answer your question, when a mile run is conducted on the current standard 400 meter track, yes they do have a start line 9.35 meters before the common finish line, or on many tracks approximately at the point of the triangle markings of the beginning of the 4x400 relay passing zone. To properly give quarter mile splits, they cascade 1/4 the distance to the finish line on each successive lap. On legacy quarter mile (440 yard) tracks they can still use even laps, but there are very few quarter mile tracks in existence and even fewer of them ever in use by elite competitions. Trackinfo (talk) 01:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the 1609.32 metres as unsourced. Well spotted, don't know how I missed it for so long. --NSH001 (talk) 16:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mile run. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mile run. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140605051710/http://diamondleague.com/Results/Eugene/re8140040.pdf to http://diamondleague.com/Results/Eugene/re8140040.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sourcing

The sourcing for the record times in this article is atrocious. Some tables have no sources at all (e.g., Indoor and Outdoor records for Men and Women, Season's best), some tables have a partially used column for sources (e.g., Boys top 25), some have a completely empty column for sources (e.g., Girls top 25), and some have a reference for the table as a whole, but the reference access date is wrong and the table does not agree with the cited source (e.g., Top 25 Men's indoor: the prose says it is "Correct as of March 2019", but het ref access date is Feb 10, 2018, and the ref lists the #1 time as "3:48.45 Hicham EL GUERROUJ 14 SEP 1974" but our table lists "3:47.01 Yomif Kejelcha 3 March 2019" ) Meters (talk) 23:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

feet vs yards?

History section starts with: "Although a statute mile today is equal to a length of 5,280 feet, the distance of the English mile gained its current definition of 1,760 yards through a statute of the Parliament of England in 1593."
What does this mean? It was measured in feet, but now in yards? Because 5280 feet is exactly 1760 yards. And, actually, source to that [3] (Britannica), does not mention yards at all and has 5280 feet as well. 46.132.3.220 (talk) 12:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]