Talk:Millennials/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

One man's opinion

This is an interesting discussion for someone that was born in December 1975.

     If Generation x is defined as being an adult during the 80's then I don’t fall into that category. I have 3 sisters one born in 1972 and two others born in 1990 and 1993 we are all children of a baby boomer mom who was born in 1952. I have an older cousin who was born in 1970 who I would label Generation X but I would not label myself that.
     I was in college in 1996 when the internet blossomed and we used in more than anyone High school kid around because we had free access to it at school.  I had a Commador 64 computer at home when I was 7 but had and Apple 2 E at school as early has 4th grade. I did not go to the arcade and play Pac Man and Donkey Kong like and Generation X would have, instead I have owned every video game system from an Atari to Placation 2 and I watched cartoons when they were only on Saturday morning. 
   One of my sister is 18 and I do not think she is in the same generation has me or my two cousins that were both born in the early to mid 80's. If they are definitely Generation Y then I am more like them then some 18 years old that does not remember when MTV showed Music Videos.  
   So if Generation X is defined as some one born after the baby boomers and being adult in the 80's then I say the rough dates for X are 64-73 and thus making Generation Y dates around 74-87. If you are under 21 and have been in High School in the last few years and dont know who Puck is then no way you are part of Generation Y. The Y'ers are suppose to be entering the work force and moving up the corporate ladder as we speak. You can’t be doing that if you not out of college yet. The kids in the schools now are way different the a 24 year old who grew up with cable TV being 32 stations and not having and I pod or Cell phone with at all times. Anyone that has had a cell phone since they were 14 years old is not part of Generation Y. You my friend are part of an unnamed Generation one that has had everything given to them by their Generation X parents.

goldenbear1975a

more on the global generation Y

(Sorry, I got it long this time) With the appearance and rise of internet the existance of localized generation types is, somehow dying... Somehow every country and area will have independant features, just like every individual has a different set of experience from the first individual net to him or her. Nonetheless now, more than ever before, a worldwide generation can be spoken of. Even the japanese phenomena known as Hikikomori and/or "parasitic singles" (which, on one hand I cannot apply on myself as I'm not Japanese, but on the other hand I shall apply on myself since, despite the notion that in Hispanoamerica it's normal for children to live with their parents even in their twenties, I life with them, like many people do, but I, unlike that many people, are currently in the NEET group, dedicated mostly to writing and thus both things, a parasitic single and a hikikomori but nope, there is no pride in these words) can on the other hand of it's nature show this world where virtuality can replace reality many times in many ways.

Life is more sedentary as one has access to a world of possibilities and the possibility of the world through internet. Unlike what a pseudo-funny a***ole's comic strip in a local newspaper tried to claim the usage of internet as media expression is not based in the lack of willingness people have to pay attention to those using this media. It's based on the cheap cost, easy distribution, wide spread and apparent immortality of using it (those making these publications can easily expected the realization of their hope that what they write will remain in someone's software, somewhere, somehow).

Besides connection to the personally unknown and the huge database (sadly diminished with the appearance of an excess of stupidly-made mirrors of Wikipedia of which only Answers.com can be forgiven for their redundance as they at least add translations to most words they deal with, others just waste search-space) internet offers comfy communication with people personally known through instant messaging system (it's interactive and real-time like phone calls or personal presence, it's written like mails and e-mails, it allows to communication with more than one person, like personaly presence, it allows personal communcation with all these people, unlike all the other options and just fails in the lack of physical contact during it's employment).

Well... I think I'm missing my point, nonetheless I'm making it. The description of "Generation Y beyond USA" in the article tried to be global through the differences and surely failed. South America was totally left out of the explanation and so was Iceland, Greenland, Africa, the middle east, etc. It would have been better to explain Worlwide Generation Y through what we've got in common and... 'Though' I've not yet started and thus ended any formal studies in Anthropology (since I know that, despite this worldwide generation I belong to, my country is still ran by it's a**ole from previous generations who can't see beyond their seats and pretend peruvian-born anthropologists to be experts in Peru's pre-hispanic cultures and nothing more or philosophy students to be either red as the grudge they feel against the wealthier or blue as the catholic wallets they store their dirty money in)... I would appreciate some good analysis on this generation from a worldwide (not country-centric) anthropologic viewpoint. Not signed in, GTB 03:27 AM, 8th August 2006 (Local time, Greenwhich -5 that is)

Been watching this page a long time

..and right now, the first two paragraphs are the best I've seen them, and then the article descends into poorly-written conjecture and even includes a link to some self-aggrandized individual's myspace? WTF. I think having the first two paragraphs alone should do the topic justice for Wiki purposes, then point to external links for discussion, such as the Fourthturning forum on Millennials. --Biddy563768.23.74.113 19:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

You can thank me, I wrote them. Ivymike21 20:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Original research

I think the Majority of this artical should be scraped as most of it falls under WP:NOR, I have no objection to the concept itself. The artical reads like an essay that belongs in a journal with aruments not facts.-Fabhcún 22:10, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

If I don't have evidence, it's POV. If I do have evidence, then, it's original research. So, I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place. r430nb

The idea of a "generation" is a social construction, so any 'evidence' that you put forth is entirely conjectural. The only difference between a "generation" existing or not existing is how many people believe it exists.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.67.223.127 (talk • contribs) 10:44, January 7, 2007

Fabhcún 23:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

I've been trying to get facts to support the MTV Generation and the accompanying List of MTVers, which is ok, but now they are going to delete the list of MTVers even though I found a quote from Reese Witherspoon confessing that she didn't belong to Generation X. That is more evidence than the list of celebrities in Gen X. Now they are going to delete MTV generation, even though I found sources for that too. So, now you know why I don't have enough in me to look for Cryderman. If you don't, it's because people don't try to help out, nor do they try to give a reasonable amount of time for a person to find sources, they just vote for deletion right away. But it's too late now because Piecraft just quit. The proof is there on the MTV Generation page for a "cusp" group between X and Y, please look through it and the list of MTVers and vote "keep" in the "this articles entry". Yes, I would be supportive of waiting until Generation Y has their stuff together before putting a label or description on them, but for the cusp group in between, the time has come to start defining who we are. BTW, there are no definite boundaries for the cusp group unlike most generations claiming that they end and begin on a single year (which is rediculous). Someone said they were from 1985, can they please look through the MTV generation page to see if it includes them or not and don't forget to vote "Keep". r430nb

Yes thats fine but why dont you do one thing at a time then you can conentrait on geting the artical right with citations first, the point is you seem to gallop along with out letting the dust settle Fabhcún 01:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

I'd like to put my two cents into this discussion. I've been watching this page for a little while. I've read roughly 70% of the discussion entries here.

I was born in 1984, which, according to most sources, puts me fairly solidly in "Generation Y", the "Millennial Generation", or whatever you want to call us (I have read a piece online that claims that our official name is "Millennials").

I think that some people here are trying to hard to find defining moments that define a generation (like the Vietnam War to the Boomers, for example). I don't disagree that there are moments of history that define a generation, but I think that people are trying too hard to find defining moment for Millennials.

Here's a good guideline to tell whether someone is a "Millennial":

1. they were born around the time that the videogame market was taking off (NES or later)2. their parents are Baby Boomers 3. they remember many of the cartoons and pop culture icons of the 90s 4. they were born in the 1980s, were kids in the 1990s, teenagers in the late 90s or 00s, and college students in the later 00s (present day) 5. they can remember pre-internet computing 6. they are extremely adept with computers/technology.

Now, I'm not trying to pigeonhole and say that you can only be a "Millennial" if you fit all of those guidelines to the letter. But I think that they say a lot about one's generation.

Amen to that. I mean, some of the stuff in the article is silly. How is Woodstock '99 a defining moment for Generation Y? Seriously. There are whole bunch of things listed in the article that really aren't important. Frankly, I think the article should stick to defined events and information per cited sociological works. Otherwise, toss them. Things like 9/11, the Gulf War, the advent of the Internet, etc. Those are significant. But Woodstock '99? This article is long and rambling and smacks of a lot of uncited research. --Lendorien 20:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

It's too early.

I think it's still too early to be making any assumptions about this generation yet. I was born in 1985, so I guess I'm definitley part of this generation. I think it's too early because many generation yers are in their late teens and early 20s still, some of them even still in middle school. We still have the 2010s to work on! Let's take generation x for example. IN the 80s, most of them already in their teens and twenties, and they didn't really get a label until the early 90s (grunge). Kurt Cobain and Eddie Vedder are gen xers, and they were 24 and 27 when they became famous respectively. So this generation still has a while to go I'm sure, until we can make any definite assumptions and generalities yet.

so are you for deleting this page or just accknoledging the term briefy-Fabhcún 00:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

I was just acknowledging the term briefly and I was bored. I believe this page needs to stay, but I don't believe some of the things (ie popular culture) should be used to be used to define us yet. Our time in popular culture is more than likely not over yet. This is just my opinion though.

I agree, it is far too early to begin summing up with any note of finality what exactly gen Y is. The best way to succinctly sum up the Y generation is what its beginnings are. That it is the last generation where some of its earlier members (like myself b.1984) can recall a time before the mass digitalization of society: Internet, DVD technology, Cell phones, commonality of gaming consoles and gaming in general, and the like. In my opinion, the crossover from non-digital to digital would be the biggest "note of importance". All other references to pop culture, et al. are pretty worthless because there are still some Gen X and pre-Gen X leftovers (Rolling Stones, Aerosmith for example) who made the crossover into our Generation.

---

YOU'RE SO RIGHT i WAS BORN IN 1985 AND I SHARE ALL WHAT YOU SAID.-

And in my opinion the people who share all these facts were born between 1983-1994, there is not doubt about it. Here you have a good post I found in imdb:

(this boy was born in 1985)

""You know you're a 90's kid if... -You can sing the rap to "The Fresh Prince Of Bel Air"* -You know that "WOAH" comes from Joey from "Blossom" -and that "How Rude!" comes from Stephanie from "Full House"* -You remember when it was actually worth getting up early on a Saturday to watch cartoons.* -You got super excited when it was Oregon Trail day in computer class at school.**** -You remember reading "Goosebumps"* -You know the profound meaning of "Wax on, wax off" -You remember the craze when the banning of slap bracelets and slam books. -You still get the urge to say "NOT" after (almost) every sentence...Not...* -You knew that Kimberly, the pink ranger, and Tommy, the green Ranger were meant to be together. ** (Kimberly was hot!) -You remember "I've fallen and I can't get up" -You remember going to the skating rink before there were inline skates* -You ever got injured on a Slip 'n' Slide* (Sort Of) -You wore socks over leggings scrunched down (I'm a dude!) -" Miss Mary Mack, Mack, Mack, all dressed in black, black, black, with silver buttons, buttons, buttons, all down her back, back, back" SHE ASKED HER MOTHER MOTHER MOTHER FOR FIFTY CENTS CENTS CENTS TO SEE THE ELEPHANTS ELEPHANTS ELEPHANTS JUMP OVER THE FENCE THE FENCE THE FENCE" he jumped so high high high he touched the sky sky sky and he didnt come back back back til the forth of july ly ly he jumped so low ow ow he stumbed his toe oe oe and thats the end end end of the elephants show ow ow*** -You remember boom boxes vs. cd players*** -You knew what it meant to say "Care Bear Stare" -You remember Alf, the little brown alien from *beep* (I had Alf slippers!) -and Vicki the Robot from "My Little Wonder" -You remember New Kids on The Block when they were cool -You knew all the characters names and their life stories on "Saved By The Bell"** -You played and or collected "Pogs" (Hell FREAKING ***) -You used to pretend to be a MIGHTY MORPHIN Power Ranger**** -and you owned a Skip It -You had at least one Tomagatchi or NanoPet and brought it everywhere** -You watched the original Care Bears -and Ninja Turtles*** -Yikes pencils and erasers were the *beep* -You remember when the new Beanie Babies were always sold out.*** -You remember a time before the WB.** -You've gotten creeped out by "Are You Afraid of the Dark?"*** -You thought it would be so cool to be Alex Mack.*** -You know the Macarena by heart.. LOL *** -" Talk to the hand" ... enough said* ** -You thought Brain woud finally take over the world*** -You always said, "Then why don't you marry it!"** -you were the KING of the Tether ball Court (NEVER, I sucked at teatherball. Probably still do.) """

I remember all those things and most of the people in that thread who was born in this time remembered it too.

Another post...

this boy was born 1987

Best of 90's:

1) Cartoons - Ren and Stimpy, Beavis and Butthead, Tenchi Muyo, Rugrats, Rocco's Modern Life, The Dreamstone, South Park, Timon and Pumbaa, Family Guy, The Hurricanes, Bimble's Bucket, Earthworm Jim, Hey Arnold! Reboot, Sonic, Batman, Animaniacs, Freakazoid, Pinky and the Brain, Stressed Eric, The Simpsons, Chip 'N' Dale, Talespin, Spiderman, X-Men, Tiny Toon Adventures, Goof Troop, Ducktales

2) Films: Terminator II, The Matrix, Pulp Fiction, Trainspotting, American Pie, The Full Monty, Austin Powers, The Big Lebowski, Fight Club, Braveheart, Toy Story, Aladdin, The Nightmare Before Christmas, South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut, The Lion King, Forrest Gump, Philadelphia, Schindler's List, Goodfellas, American History X, Scream, The Usual Suspects, Silence of the Lambs, Reservoir Dogs, Kingpin, The Mask, Dumb and Dumber, Home Alone, Wayne's World, Jurassic Park, Fifth Element, Edward Scissorhands, The Truman Show, Blade, Ace Ventura, True Lies, Man on the Moon, Baz Luhrman's Romeo and Juliet, Batman Returns, Independance Day

3) Music: Radiohead, Foo Fighters, Slipknot, Travis, KoRn, The Verve, Oasis, Blur, Gouryella, Faithless, David Gray, Feeder, Bush, Smashing Pumpkins, Prodigy, Jamiroquai, Green Day, Swervedriver, Soundgarden, Pearl Jam, Fatboy Slim, Robert Miles, Prince, Nirvana (if you count the Nevermind era), Fugees, Lightning Seeds, U2, Metallica, Catatonia, Manic Street Preachers, R.E.M, Underworld, Sash!, Chicane, Ash, Chumbawumba, Skank Anansie

4) Technology: Playstation, the compact disc, fears of the millenium bug, Sega Saturn, Nintendo 64, the internet becomes used by the whole world, the Game Boy? cloning (Dolly the Sheep), the CD player, microphones for computers, chat rooms, webcams, the Talkboy, Tamigotchis,

5) Games: Street Fighter, Sonic, Quake, Doom, Duke Nukem, Tekken, Resident Evil, Wipeout, Gran Turismo, Time Crisis, Tomb Raider, Colin McRae Rally, Lu Wang, Championship Manager, Prince of Persia, Crash Bandicoot, Grand Theft Auto

6) TV: The Fast Show, Friends, Harry Enfield, Red Dwarf, Shooting Stars, 2 Point 4 Children, Grange Hill, The Demon Headmaster, Neighbours and Home & Away used to be good, Kenan & Kel, Teen Angel, Frasier, Married...with Children, Boy Meets World, Men Behaving Badly, Father Ted, Queer as Folk, Alan Partridge, Hollyoaks, Poke'mon (I hate it now), Brass Eye, Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, TGI Friday, Goosebumps, Are You Afraid of the Dark? Mighty Morphin Power Rangers, Finders Keepers, Knightmare, The Crystal Maze

7) Other things I'll remember: the Heaven's Gate cult, Tony Blair becomes Prime Minister, Bill Clinton and Monica, Halley-Bopp's comet, the Tory party using single mothers as scapegoats, the Dunblane massacre, Columbine, the Spice Girls, Oasis vs Blur, Generation X, indie kids, Kurt Cobain's death, Manchester United win many times, Eric Cantona attacking a fan, David Beckham and Posh Spice get too much publicity, The Berlin Wall is knocked down, Nelson Mandela is freed, the Gulf War, the war in Kosovo, Bryan Adams is number 1 in UK for most of the summer of 1991, huge sales in mobile phones, the World Trade Center is bombed, the Goo Goo Dolls hit it big with 'Iris', Aryton Senna is killed, the O.J Simpson courtroom drama, the Oklahoma bombing, thee serial killers Rose and Fred West, 2Pac Shakur is killed, Notorious B.I.G is also killed, Manchester is bombed by IRA along with London, England vs Germany in Euro '96, Hong Kong is returned to China, Mike Tyson bites off Evander Holyfield's ear, Tiger Woods, Liz Hurley's Versace dress, thongs become popular, the invention of Viagara, the Euro, Top of the Pops used to be a good show, Eastenders was at it's prime, Britpop, nu-metal becomes a household name in the US, the moral panic of Ecstacy and illegal raves after teenager Leigh Betts died after taking 1 Ecstacy pill, the Chicago Bulls used to be a good basketball team, Summer of Trance in 1999, dance music used to be good, Britney Spears, Tom and Jerry being shown on BBC1 every Saturday evening, Ren & Stimpy being shown on BBC2 every Thursday evening, Radiohead's OK Computer becomes a worldwide success, Elton John sings Candle in the Wind for Princess Diana, George Michael gets arrested for a lewd act in a public toilet in LA, Sepultura hit the mainstream, the whole world has to endure Celine Dion and Titanic in 1997, Hanson give the world a headache with 'Mmmbop', Take That become a boy band phenomenon which gives rise to the mediocre Backstreet Boys and N'Sync, meningitus becomes a moral panic, the UK bans handguns, the Green Revolution, the war in Rwanda, paedophiles become a moral panic, the abduction of James Bulger, Richey Edwards goes missing and has not been found since, Jerry Springer becomes an overnight sensation, Manchester United win their treble, the Goosebumps books, Geri Halliwell's Union Jack dress, how fashionable it was to wear trainers with the laces undone, Hampster dance, the dance to the Macarena, KLF at the Brit Awards, John Prescott having a bucket of water thrown at him, Brian Harvey gets kicked out of East 17 after talking on radio that Ecstacy is not harmful, the Simpsons Lollapalooza episode, many parts of England become flooded during Easter 1998

Overall, despite some of the bad things that happened in the 90's, it was a bloody good decade. Thank God I was able to grow up in that time and witness it all.

In 2000's: *cricket noise in background* """

You know what i mean? the generation Z, should begin in 1995, because the memories of these kids mostly will begin after the 2001, and they won't remember almost nothing of the 90s. While the kids who were born in the early 90 will remember most of these things along with the childs who was born since 1983 (of couse these will remember more, but they were kids too).

WHAT DO YOU THINK?????

New Changes

---

January 5, 2006- I've added around 16 new links divided into several catagories. A part of this includes two foreign links as well.

Quote- :Thanks for the contribution. r430nb

Glad I can help! :-)

---

December 28, 2005 As you can see there have been several changes as of December,28th 2005. This is my first actual posting with Wikipedia so I apologize for any errors and will correct them if they are pointed out. However it did appear that there were several sections of this article that did in fact need revising so I went ahead because of several errors including....

"The majority of Generation Xers, however, clearly do not believe that people born at the end of the 1970s belong in their generation, as these people would have been no older than elementary school children or in early adolescence (or, for the youngest, not even born) when the definitive rock bands Nirvana and Pearl Jam became popular in 1991."

This is based only on opinion, and as a late 76r who suddenly finds himself cutoff from his peers, not a very good one. I have a hard time believing that there is more in common between me and someone born in 1965 who listened to Kiss at age 14 in 1979, then my very own friends and classmates. People born in 1979 were already in high school when Cobain committed suicide, so it's hard to believe that someone only 4 months younger belongs to the same group that grew up on Barney and Teletubbies.

Birth rates in the United States peaked around 1983-87 and have dropped considerably since then, but remain higher than in the 1960s– early to mid '70s.

This is out and out incorrect. If you take a look at the (CDC report- Table 1-1. Live Births, Birth Rates, and Fertility Rates, by Race: United States,1909-2000 )you'll see that there has never been a birthrate higher since 1971's rate at 17.2% per 1000. In reality this report proves that the so called "babybust" and "echoboom" are misconceptions.

The cohort comprises those born in the late 20th Century, between the years 1977 - 1994 While common, this dating system is only one of many popular spans of Gen Y. Both this and the "MTV generation entry" are determined to make 1977 the official start of what is considered Gen Y.

Although many people on this page have complained about the sections dealing with music, culture, ect, I decided to leave these area's basically alone since I am not an authority on what "core" Y's do in fact like. However many of the artists and entertainment that is listed is in fact produced by "core" xrs and is enjoyed by them as well. It seems that the popular belief is that Xrs simply had nothing more to contribute to society and simply disappeared after Cobain committed suicide. But I do realize that this article does recognize the Xr contribution to modern society.

Here is a listing of my changes-

1-Rewrote Introduction 2-Replaced 1990's with 2000's to recognize the entire combined birthspan of both Gen X and Y. 3-Removed Boundries section and combined new information with the introduction. 4-Removed first paragraph of Generation Y in the United States since it was only one set of dates being presented as the only official one. 5-Added the definition of what the "echo boom" actually was. 6-Removed from the culture section the phrase This generation was also the first to experience: since every generation experienced these events at the same time. Instead I replaced it with "This generation experienced these events as they came of age". 7-Added long requested references which I can add more.

It's too late to continue as I write this but I plan on adding a lot more external links to help deepen this article.

I don't want to step on anyone's toes by doing this and realize that all my work can be wiped out. But I had to say something because this is one of the issues that effects me deeply. I have a little experience on this topic, posting articles and having active memberships on generational forums such as the Fourthturning, the old Generation X-Aimoo forum, and briefly even hosting my own called "Generational Nexus". I don't normally write such lengthy introductions but this is my first activity here at the Wikipedia. Wyn 08:08, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the contribution. r430nb

Where used - not outside the US and Canada?

January 5, 2006 As stated above I've added two links to articles dealing with Gen Y outside the U.S. What I've seen researching this topic, the term Gen Y is popular outside of America. Wyn

Please stop adding that these terms are used only in North America. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 21:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

It's true though. This whole "generation theory" stuff based on this book/Strauss and Howe isn't used by practically anyone outside of the US/Canada, and that's unsubstantiated quackery in any case.. --Mistress Selina Kyle ^{(Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉)} 21:46, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Do some research before engaging in revert wars. [1] [2] SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

I can't speak for anywhere else, but in England "Generation Y" is often used, at least informally, to describe this generation. While the interests and defining characteristics of the generation may vary from country to country, "Generation Y" doesn't seem like an unreasonable one to use as a name.

Some examples:

• "Generation Y: A Liberal Generation" - pamphlet affiliated with the English Liberal Democrats party
• Concept car website - refers to General Motors' new targeting of Generation Y
• UK government article - how to market civil service jobs to members of Generation Y
• Online UK feminism magazine - refers to convincing Generation Y of the merits of feminism

You can find a really diverse range of uses of "Generation Y" in UK media by Google searching "Generation Y" site:.uk. --Jacj 02:38, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for finding all those sources, Jacj. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 04:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

They'll all be called Global Millennials instead.

Digital section quite innacurate.

"those born in the early 1980s probably did not own a computer until their preteen or teen years in the early to mid-1990s."

Patently false. the Apple ][, Commodore64 and TRS80 personal computers were a huge hit in the very early 80's, and were commonly available in the homes of genx'ers (even if they didn't own them outright).

It may be more accurate to mark the boundary with the presence of computers in everyday life. Late gen-xers (such as myself (1974))remember a time when computers were very rarely seen. Around 1978, computers started showing up at POS systems, banks, movies, TV etc etc).

Generation Y'ers have always been surrounded by computers, and would not find their presence remarkable, or even interesting.

I'm from 1978. I remember 1990 and watching a newscast talking about how the birth rate was so high that year and they said congratulations to the parents. By 1991-2 I could have been someone's parent because I was 13-14. I remember wondering how it would be like having so many people around in the future. Ok, I know I'm old!! How many times have the dates changed on this page? People keep on changing the dates between 1977 and mid 80s. I think this page should be for those born mid 80s-?. And those born late 70s should go to MTV Generation. 1977-85 numbers around 32 million people in the US. 1985-1995 is way above 40 million people. These are two different groups. If we keep on combining together, this page isn't going to describe either of us. Worse, it's not going to describe the majority of Millennial people who were born around the 90s, which is unfair. They are the majority and they own the name, so they should describe this group, not the MTV Generation, not Generation X either. They (1985-?) are the best judges of what their generation is. It's not worth it to put all this hard work into this article, when it gets erased the next day by either group. We'll never agree. We might as well just split. Likewise, about the person above talking about Comodore64 and TRS80 - that would be of more interest to the MTV Generation rather than the Millennial Generation because we remember it, they don't. Like how libraries were still using those old index cards for looking books up, how we actually wrote letters to each other through the mail, or faught over the home phone. And the computers we had didn't have internet. We were living in the stone age compared to them. Same thing with that section on "Hip Hop Rise/Fall of Rock and Roll" and "Acceptance of Adult-Oriented Media" because they were still being born at that time. I'm thinking that if they were born at that time, then they won't care about it, so how can that define what they are? The only thing it does is prove differences with other generations, not identity. Previous generations don't have the authority to go in and define it. Am I right? Shouldn't this be what they care about/influenced them because that affects what they will do throughout their lives? r430nb 12/18

REPLY: Gen Y is 1983-1996. I'm 1990-born. Maybe 1997-2001 could squeeze in there too; it depends how culturally similar they are to '80s and early '90s kids. I'm kinda iffy about having kids born after the 2000 mark be Gen Y, or really even have post-1996 kids be in the gen because 1997 was such a changeful year and they would at best be only 4 years old when 9/11 happened, although I'm sure they would have slight memories of Gulf War II. Above somebody said 1990ers shouldn't be Gen Y! That's ridiculous, I have much more in common with an '85er than with even a '95er.

I'd say 1986-1992 is the core of Gen Y; 1977-1985 it really depends on personality whether you're X or Y, 1993-2001 time will have to tell the exact bound between Y and "Z" but I'm pretty sure that kids born prior to 1997 are Yers and not Zers. 1990 is DEFINITELY Gen Y, no argument.

Not that I'm proud of my "Y-hood".

Sorry, I know 1990 is part of Gen Y. I meant something else - that 1990 was part of Y, but for those that fall in between, it's hard to put a boundary separating one from the next. Like he said above, it depends on personality. Ok, forget about what I said about 77-85, what I meant is that there is a group of years that fall in between X and Y where people identify with a combination of both, either or neither. It's not like one year is X and the next year everyone is Y, like how Strauss and Howe portray it. They say that just because the baby on board sticker was invented and people became more protective over their children in 1982 that it totally made them different from people a year before. If you grew up in these boundary years, you would see it's more like a group of years where people totally disagree with one another of each other's identity and that there is no right or wrong identity at all, but common experiences from growing up at the same time. There is no definiteness in belonging to a specific generation. In fact, there is more conflict in this group over common identity than in people in core years of generations. So, even if Generation Y starts at 82 or 83 or 86, that doesn't mean that the years before that are X. I'm just speculating, but a similar thing seems to be going on with the late 90s as well and how people are so eager to put a label on them when there might be none at all. This and many other similar experiences makes us a group, but we are less likely to determine exact boundaries as we've been through all that drama. This whole subject on Generation Y is still new, so verifiable sources may not match what people think. Who has more authority - Strauss and Howe, the Gale group, previous generations, or the people who actually come from Generation Y? Of coarse, it's going to be the person who comes from Generation Y (1990), right? When people are the subject of discussion, then verifiable sources will always be biased one way or another. So, in terms of boundary, there should be no boundary at all, but an intermediate group between both generations that has no conflict with either generation and is supportive of both. r430nb 12/18

REPLY:

Thank you. But let me get something clear: are you implying 1990 can be Gen Z to some? If you are, I respect your opinion but completely disagree.

Late 80s is definitely the core of Y, but considering Gen Y is thought of as the "Second Baby Boom" and 1990 had huge birth rates, along with the '80s I think a 1990er is definitely in the same league as an '87er or '89er.

Maybe 1994-2001 is "Gen YZ" or whatever, but absolutely not 1990.

I added the section on XY Cusp between Generation X and Y. r430nb

On the subject of the first paragraph. Computers were popular and readily available in the mid 80's, true, but that does not imply that GenY grew up surrounded by computers. They were young, meaning their parents were paying for kid supplies, and unless they were in an upper-middle class family, were probably not surrounded by computers. Around that time yes, computers may have been prevalent in the homes of GenXers, but it wasn't until the early-mid 90's were computers cheap enough to be available in the homes of people with GenY kids. As a GenY, I did not grow up surrounded by computers, and most people of similar age didn't. In fact, a lot of GenYers I know consider GenY and Millenials to be two separate groups, the latter being those who have never known a time without cell phones and the internet, from somewhere around '90ish til now. Jessymac 20:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Why Gen Y starts in 1978

I find this a very intriguing discussion...as a person who is extremely interested in generational theory, this is right up my alley. That said, I am very comfortable with 1978 being the year that starts Generation 'Y'. As a member of that cohort, I have always noticed that there seemed to be a difference between people my age and younger and those older. Those who are older tended to be rather "angsty" and more independent, while people my age were more cheerful and goal/structure-oriented. I've been researching this stuff from time to time for four years, and I think that there is pretty good evidence out there that makes 1977/78 an excellent delineation. How about this, I was born in 1979 and I always felt more comfortable being more "angsty" and independent. Excuse but you're talking to one who doesn't believe in the Y term and prefers to be classic Xer. Maybe that's the bulk of the group of what you've mentioned butthey're always be individual differences. Here is some of it:

1) The Internet - I would venture to say that the majority of people feel that the Internet exploded roughly in the fall of 1995/winter of 1996. Therefore, we are the first cohort to have experienced the Internet before we graduated high school and became adults. I remember hearing how people who were just a couple of classes above us in college were amazed at how much we knew about computers and the Internet, and that it was almost scary...like we all could teach the computer lab assistants a thing or two.

2) Education - The 1978 cohort is the first cohort that wasn't in the K-12 system when the famous "Nation at Risk" came out during the spring of 1983. Immediately after this groundbreaking survey, there were numerous changes that took place in the educational system, and we were oftentimes the first recipients of these changes. For instance, some school districts like Minneapolis started testing children at the end of kindergarten to see if they would be fit for first-grade...never before has that type of "back to basics" standardized testing taken place. Also, New York City started full day kindergarten the year we started school...given the problems NYC had just before this time, it was an incredible feat.

3) Stress - If you are familiar with the UCLA's Freshman Survey, which is performed on college freshmen every year, it asks freshmen numerous questions regarding their views on various issues, ranging from political to personal. One of the questions that is asked is whether you were frequently overwhelmed with all you had to do during your senior of high school. Between the classes of 1995 (77 cohorts) and 1996 (78 cohorts), there was a marked increase in the percentage that said "yes"...and this jump stood up in subsequent years, so it was not a statistical fluke. At the same time, there was a similar increase in the percentage of students who received A or A- averages...whereas in previous years, the percentage was stagnant. This gives evidence that the "stress for success" syndrome was clearly being felt at this time.

There are numerous other reasons, but I won't mention them now...but it seems that there is a pretty wide gap. Culturally, there also seems to be (at least anecdotedly) evidence of a gap. It seems that whenever someone born in 1976, 77 talks about their 80s experiences, they mention Atari, 80s music and movies. But it seems that for people my age and younger, it's Nintendo, cartoons and toys...more childish stuff.

Interesting, some late 70s people like Y and some early 80s people like X. Opposites. r430nb

Let's just look at it this way, if you were born circa 1977-1981, then you're not really Gen X and not really Gen Y culturally speaking. You were too young to remember the 80s Teen Movie craze and too old to openly admit to liking the Teen Movie craze of the early 2000s (we're not talking "American Pie," but movies with Sarah Michelle Gellar and the like). The same goes for boybands. I was 18 years old when Backstreet Boys first became big. While I was still in high school (I'm from Ontario, Canada, where there was, at that time an extra year of high school (OAC)), other people my age would have already started university. In terms of technology, many of us didn't see our first computers until we were well into elementary school. If we owned a PC, they ran on DOS (remember that???). Many of us worked on Commodore 64s. Unlike the "real Millenials/Gen Y" we aren't talked about very much, perhaps even ignored by the media. We didn't really have the "teen idols" that REAL Gen Ys do (i.e. we were pushing 20, if not already there, when many of the "teen stars" of the early 2000s became famous). We're kind of like the Babyboomers who were born in the early 60s. That generation (which my parents are a part of) is often associated with peace and the Beatles to name two. How can someone born in 1960 really associate him or herself with the Beatles when they were only three or four years old when John, Paul, Ringo and George played on the Ed Sullivan Show? By the time they moved into their university dorms, Disco had taken over sit-ins. Not to mention, the early baby-boomers were already having kids in the 70s. Yet, they too are labelled as "baby-boomers." Writerchick 05:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

It seems that whenever someone born in 1976, 77 talks about their 80s experiences, they mention Atari, 80s music and movies. But it seems that for people my age and younger, it's Nintendo, cartoons and toys...more childish stuff.

According to this statement, only those born after 1977 experienced the 80's as a child, which is completely false. A 76r experienced the 80's from age 3 to 13, not 13 to 23. Yes our parents had Atari's, and we also had Nintendo's, played with toys like GI Joes and Transformers, and watched all kinds of cartoons throughout the 80's.

Wyn

I should point out though that the facts regarding the stress at college and the "Nation at Risk" reports are valid points because they are based on scientific and sociological discoveries. Personally though, you'll find that every birthyear has changes in it that make unique from the next.

As for the comments made by WriterChick they help show that cultural (as based on pop culture) generations do not exist. As you've pointed out using the great boomer generation, one trend can only cover a small amount of people and not an entire generation. If anything, trends in pop culture can only describe waves or cusps at best. The Boomers were generally described by the birthrate that lasted between 1946 and 1964, and this span has experienced an entire rainbow of popculture and trends including Psychedelic, Disco, Punk, Classic and Southern Rock, and others. Today it seems we're trying to define a generation based on every trend which is rather silly considering that most only last for a few years. Wyn

It should say "Most sources disagree on the start date, placing those born between mid 70s to mid 80s in Generation X or Y, but there is a general consensus that those born in the 80s and early 90s are definitely Generation Y." I got this idea from this person born in 1990 up above.... Then..."Some sources recognize generation Y as those born between mid 70s to mid 80s. William Strauss and Neil Howe define a cohort-group (all persons born in a limited span of consecutive years) whose length approximates the span of a phase of life (approximately 22 years). Therefore, for purposes of this article, those born mid 70s to early 80s are not considered a separate generation, but a cohort or cusp called the XY Cusp and Generation Y refers to those born in the 1980s to early 1990s." or something to that affect. After all, boundaries are fixed by peer personality (a generational persona recognized and determined by common age location, common beliefs and behavior, and perceived membership in a common generation). Just look at all the posts, it seems most people from Gen Y don't "perceive" the 70s as "members" of this Generation. Of coarse, they are still teenagers and we are late 20s. We lack "common age location." We don't see things the same way and won't come out with the same memories, which prevents us from sharing "common beliefs" with them. r430nb

---

Although the years for what consist of GenY run the board, I generally found that they came into 3 groups.If we were to use S&H's system as a base then the 3 groups would be classified in 1- Late 13r 2- 13r\Millenial cusp 3- Millennial.

The idea of Gen Y being an X\Y cusp is pretty popular over at the "Fourthturning" boards (Millennial being the official term for the next gen according to S&H's theory).

I do believe that if generations are recognized then cusps like what you describe are important parts of any generations design. I personally believe though that 76 belongs to the any mid 70's thru mid 80's cusp or wave, because those born between 76-81 were the first to start highschool in the 90's and the last to finish it in the 90's.

But when comes down to it I believe that each birthyear gives it's own unique perspective in time. The amount of overlapping or distance between the experiences of two people can be partially be determined according to their distance from one another's year. However there are other factors that determine how close two peoples outlooks are as well.

Wyn

I agree, each year is different, we can still be different and be in the same group, so there is no need to draw a lines, but the 75-85 group grew up around the same time frame, so it doesn't matter how different each year turned out. r430nb

---

I believe that the change from Gen X to Gen Y (or millenials) is a little different than how they are categorized here. I would agree with 1977 being the cusp between the end of Gen X to another generation. However, I wouldn't classify the start of Gen Y until roughly the end of 1985. Both of these "mainstream" generations have their very own qualifying events, music revolutions, and technological comfort level. The gap in these two generations, as I suggest, is more of a "borrowed" generation. These people were either predisposed to and more interested in older and more Gen X style, or having a similar prediliction for newer Gen Y styling but being older than the average.

People born roughly within the range I suggest did not have their own trends. They were not directly marketed to by the mainstream media. Many felt too old for alot of Gen Y trends, yet are too young themselves to be able to comfortably feel like Gen X'ers. We were raised on Atari and given the Nintendo, saw the beginnings of Mtv, yet have nothing that was truly our own.

I understand the idea of being in the cusp, split between both. But for a short period in there, alot of people were born that do not belong in either category. We were a generation of hand-me-down-culture, unnoticed by the marketing machine, alienated from any spectacular and generation-defining moments. Animosity2 00:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Gen Y?

Gen X is a historical thing, the people who grew up "in the shadow" of the Baby boomers, their children. I'm not sure there's any real historical significance to a Gen Y other than people like to name things for naming sake. --DanielCD 04:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

---

I basically agree. When I originally posted my version I called Gen Y a marketers term because in fact it was invented by marketers according to the ADAge article reference here to describe those born from 1974 to 1980. Since then the dating of the generation has varied from writer to writer according to what age demographic they're targeting at the time.

In comparison, Generation X was first invented by social authors Jane Deverson and Charles Hamblet to describe Baby Boomers back in 1964. Then author Douglas Coupland used in 1990 the term to describe his peers born around 1961. Since then it has been used as a generic term for the generation following the Baby Boomers.

If you believe in generations then there has been a post Boomer generation as well as a second post Boomer Generation born using the standard 18-20 year spans. Struass and Howe identified these these two generations and how they are different socially. However when we start trying to define generations culturally we start to get into a slippery slope.

Wyn

Thanks for that information. I think I'm going to look into the writings of those authors. It always seemed to me that Gen X was the generation that grew up before all the child-overprotection/superpampering and neo-teaching techniques started. Growing up in a world with the old habits of existance, yet with a format that's changed so extensively (i.e. from b&w TV and big plastic phones to the Internet and cell phones.) X grew up in a world still living by the old rules, but now as adults have to live in a world with the new rules, with no buffer time like their parents had. Everyone after X grew up in the new world with the new rules. These are my personal insights, nothing more.

I was in a store the other day and a kid (15-16ish) came in and asked the clerk to use the phone. She gave him an old dial (rotary) phone from under the counter and went to do something else. He stared at it for a few minutes and then confessed, he had no idea what it was or how to use it. Anyway I thought that was kinda cute. I haven't read the Wikipedia article on Gen X, so perhaps I should go do that. Thanks for the response. --DanielCD 14:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

---

Hi Daniel,

You are correct about Gen X being the general term for the post Boomer generation. I was just providing some historical context as to the origins of the two terms. I haven't made any comments on the Gen X article yet but plan to do so later. However it was due to the article that I did first learn about how Jane Deverson invented the term. Here are links to some articles which I used in my response for a deeper study

• "The original GenX"
• "The Fourthturning"
• "Who's filling Gen Y's shoes?"

Wyn

Does Not Mention anything With The Current Trend Of Classic Rock Revival

Ever notice how there are more led zeppelin beatles acdc shirts and other merchandise all those old rock bands and us kids that were born in the 80's and early 90's are all wearing them, I for myself and everyone at my schol are getting bored with current music because are musical tastes are maturing, so we go back to the good stuff which is Music of the 60's 70's even 50's, so please do some On this you can find a lot about this phenomenon with classic rock and how the current state of music is so bad that we have to resort to this.

The musical influence of older forms of rock seems to already be felt in artists listened to by Generation Y; for example, the success of The White Stripes (whose audience includes at least just as many Gen X'ers as Gen Y'ers and a substantial proportion of boomers), who hearken back to late 1960s blues-rock and garage-rock, and the early 2000s garage rock revival, may indicate an aspect of "anti-Gen Y" sentiment.

---

Spiderman 1 & 2 not mentioned

This is clearly 2 of da best movies so far in Gen Y why aren't they mentioned?

"Because you touch yourself at night." Seriously, what the hell kind of argument is this? You didn't even leave your name. If you have a problem with them not being mentioned, add them in the appropriate location. But if you mention the Spider-Man movies, you have to add in the X-Men movies too. They were good.

---

Another date problem

Re: "Gen Y are usually children to the Baby Boomers and rarely early Gen Xers (about 1950 to 1969) "

1950-1969 mostly includes boomer years, not GenX. And if that parenthetical is meant to modify "Baby Boomers," it should be changed to something like 1946-1964) --Stanky 13:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

More date related discussions

I note that many people are trying to push the boundaries of Gen Y further forward in time, suggesting start dates as late as 1983. In my humble opinion, this is controversial. According to many analyses, Gen Y should start much earlier, around 1975 or 1976. This is for one simple reason: this viewpoint defines Gen Y as the echo boom generation, the children of the Baby Boomers. And the Baby Boom started in 1946. So an early baby boomer would be in his early thirties in 1978, and his mid to late thirties in 1982. Many will have had kids considerably earlier than this age, suggesting that Gen Y should in fact start in the mid seventies.

This dateshift, if accepted, leads to some material inaccuracies in the article, such as the assertion that Gen Y'ers can't remember the Challenger disaster. In fact, many older Echo Boomers (including me - born in 1977 to a father born 1946) can remember Challenegr clearly and were in elementary school at the time. We also remember the later days of the Cold War, and the Chernobyl disaster (they radiation tested my school playground in the UK).

If you accept a definition of Gen Y which equates it with the Echo Boom, you must however acknowldge that there are significant cultural disparities within the generation. The key cultural attribute of older Gen Y/Echo Boomers is that they are a transitional generation - the last-born generation who are able to remember pre-digital technology and even the cold war. Children of the late seventies are the last-born human beings, for now, to live with the credible threat of nuclear war. Younger Gen Y'ers/Echo Boomrer, on the other hand, are now in their late teens and probably can't remember the pre digital world at all. Despite the cold war, older Gen Y'ers like myself may claim to have been born in, and even to be able to remember, a gentler, slower paced world, where urban violence was considered something shocking and unusual, whereas our youngers are probably more squarely entrenched in the modern world. They grew up with text messaging (SMS) and Napster. They are not especially "transitional" at all.

One way to address thisdisparity with appropriate terminology would be to acknowledge that there is a distinctionto be made between the culturally defined notion of a generation (identified by what it thinks, says, does, eats drinks listens to and watches) and the purely demographic concept of a generation. Thus, people born 1975-1995 (roughly) are clearly part of the same demographic generation, i.e. the children of the Baby Boomers; one might call this the Echo Boom. However they clearly divide into an earlier half and a later half. The later half seem to be laying claim to the term "Gen Y" tag, leaving the older half either to be considerd some kind of rump portion of Gen X (unsatisfactory IMO) or to find the identity it has always struggled for - the cusp generation.

Made some changes

First of all I think 1977 is too early to start Gen Y, so I changed the year to c. 1982. Also 1993 is too early to end it, so I extended it to c. 1997. That's all debatable though, as I've noted. HDTV was around in the late '90s and I've noted that under technologies. I can remember HDTVs appearing in stores around 1998. I've added Broadband Internet in technologies as it was a big change from traditional analog modems. Digital Cameras are another technology I added that came into prominance in the late 1990s. I also noted that "That's So Raven" is more popular with the younger yers than older yers.

Gen Y begins in 1978

Gen Y definitely begins in 1978. A previous author was right when she mentioned that people born in that era (1978-1984) are pretty in between, the same way people born in the early 1960s are between the classic generation X and the classic baby boom.

I think there is a difference between early Generation Yers (1978-1984) and late Generation Yers (1985-1994) but I don't think people born after about 1993 or 1994 can be included in Generation Y. Part of being Gen Y is being a child of a baby boomer. My parents were born in 1955 and I was born in 1990. The baby boomers are a pretty unified generation, and even my parents consider themselves to be part of a different generation than people born in the 1940s. My parents are children of the '70s, Watergate era, and came of age as adults during the late 1970s and early 1980s yuppie/disco era. Meanwhile, someone born in 1946 remembers the conformity of the 1960s and was in high school as opposed to grade school during the JFK assassination, and could have been drafted for Vietnam. They were old enough to take part in the antiwar protests or go to Woodstock. After about 1954 the boomers were children of the '70s, while before they were children of the '60s.

The same distinction exists between early and late Y. Early Y is a transitional group between Generation X and Generation Y, and their coming-of-age was characterized by alot of change (PCs, etc.) Also, their parents included more Vietnam vets and protestors, and hippies, while most people my age have parents whose adolescent preoccupations were disco and Led Zeppelin-type rock, Watergate and the oil crisis.

I really don't think most people in Gen X would be too comfortable with people who were little kids in the '80s being in their generation. Being an adolescent in the 1980s is a Generation X requirement.

Millennials don't like the term GenY. Call them Millennials please. I must respect the Strauss and Howe camp and say Millennials began in 1982. I was born in 1979 and to me that seems very GenX as 1969.It's the same era of the Conciousness Revolution and on top of it, Carter was President. Millennials don't start until Reagen.The desire to have babies doesn't pick up until the mid-80's.

Hip-hop not popular in the late 90s?

"Contrary to popular belief, in 1997 and 1998 hip hop was in somewhat of a dead state as the deaths of Tupac and Notorious B.I.G. slowed the genre and Eminem had not yet appeared on the scene. In fact, from about 1995 on, hip hop was generally losing fans to "alternative" music; this was increased by the deaths of Tupac and Notorious B.I.G. and was not recovered until about 1999 when Eminem rose to fame." I find this very hard to believe, is there a source for this? Flyerhell 22:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Are you trying to claim that eminem "saved" rap? This is very false. Although the deaths of Tupac and the Notorious B.I.G. did have a significant impact on hip hop, this did not destroy the genre, nor was the genre solely "recovered" by eminem.

that claim seemed forced. The deaths were a huge blow to the genre, but I seem to remember Notorious BIG's posthumous album of 1997 produced by Puff Daddy (plus numerous Tupac posthumous albums) setting sales records. Mainstream hip-hop may have had less artistic credibility after those deaths until Eminem came along, but it was still bigger than ever. The only "alternative music" that was, commercially, very big at the time was stuff like Rage Against the Machine and Limp Bizkit, which itself was a fusion of rap and rock. this being the only type of music other than smoothed over "post grunge" to achieve dominance on commercial "alt rock" radio. In Britain of course it may have been very different, with bands like Radiohead actually selling a lot, not to mention Oasis and such. But even there the "Britpop" scene slowed down to make way for increased commercial dominance of American hip-hop after the mid 90s, even after these rap MCs were killed. In fact the death of Biggie is what fueled the huge sales of his album and made hip hop bigger than ever!

Eminem was however a very influential artist for Gen Y, particularly the members who were in their early teens at the time. That could remain.

Mostly nonsense

As a member of Generation Y, I'd have to say that most of what is on this page is just stereotyping and generalizing. Theres no way you can typecast total generations of people. You can say what events there were during the time period that could influence them, but theres no way you can say what their like, especially when dealing with such a massive group. For example, there is no "Anti-Y Trend", some kids just prefer older rock music to newer music and some don't. Most of this generation nonsense, I think, was made by older people trying to understand "youth culture" when in fact, there is none.

Yes you can generalize... whole generations follow social trends (related to their location on earth, trends in Japan or Africa will be completely different). It doesn't matter if you can't relate to anything at all in those trends, fact is those trends determine social evolutions, and we're all part of it. If we like it or not, these things do influence the world we live in and have to deal with --LimoWreck 13:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Removed some more nonsense

"Is Gen Y just a late Gen X?"- Pure opinion with no real fact to back it up. "The XY cusp between X and Y"- Come on, I was born in '87 and my tastes are about the same as those born in 1984 or 85, this XY cusp garbage is nothing but nonsense. Late '70s is Gen X, very early '80s is also Gen X, and 1981 or 82 on is Gen Y, there is no "cusp". Gen Y begins at the beginning of the '80s, generally around 1982 probably. The guy that keeps putting 1977 as the beginning is incorrect, that makes Gen X a 12 year generation, there is no such thing as a 12 year generation, period. I'm not going to sit here fighting about this, but I just want to make known to the public that this article is mostly factually inaccurate and filled with generalizations.

There has most definitely been a Cusp recognised between Gen X and Gen Y - thus the reason for so much dispute over the years and people who feel displaced who were born during the late 70's and early 80's. 87.80.126.226 00:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

GEN Y STARTS IN 1982

END OF STORY! STOP CHANGING THE DAMN YEAR. You have no facts to back it up, in order to keep it factual the strauss & howe years are what really should be displayed.

In South African Gen Y (Offically called the Millenial Generation) started in 1990, and ended roughly 2000-2002. This article is very "American" biased IMHO Jediwannabe 11:16, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

I've changed the years to what this one source I found says, and noted below that the exact years are debated. That's the best that really can be done given the differences between sources. Brian587 26 January 2006

If you read Strauss and Howe and even other social observers throughout the world, you'll see why

1.Millennials dislike Geny.

2.The generation starts in 1982.

3.1978-1981 births are still X.

This article still sucks and It will have to be re-titled, because Gen-Y is bullshit

We are not "Generation Y" just because the bullshit-filled Wikipedia says we are. We are not Gen-Y even if people within the generation call themselves that. We are not the "Echo-Boomers" either. We are our OWN FUCKING GENERATION. Our generation doesn't need a stupid media nickname (and if it absolutely needs one so bad writers can write derogatory articles about our lack of culture, it shouldn't just lazily compare us to other generations, as these two examples do).

This generations nickname hasn't even been officially decided yet. It's just as much valid to call us the "milennial generation" and yet this page is still titled "Generation Y" on the basis that someone wrote an article that refers to us that way. Well, what if I'd wrote an article referring to the Baby Boomers as "The Hypocrtical self-aggrandizing jackass generation that accomplished nothing and took credit for everything"? Can we re-title the "Baby Boomer" page on that basis? I don't think Generation Y is in popular usage enough to call us that. And even if it is, fuck it, I'll delete this entire goddamned article and keep doing it every time someone reverts it until I'm fucking banned because it's bullshit bullshit bullshit. Fuck you very much.

I agree

All of this generation stuff is bullshit generalizations and stereotypes. We don't need B.S. in Wikipedia. Please get rid of the generation things. There is no Gen Y, there is no Baby Boomer, there is no Gen X. These so-called "generations" are actually just observations of our own popular media culture, for example: whatevers on television.

This article still needs cleaning up. It contradicts itself many times over and is factually inaccurate. It reads like it has been edited too many times with sentences extended instead of paragraphs being re-written.

---

OOOK i don't think this is us?

"I think it's still too early to be making any assumptions about this generation yet. I was born in 1985, so I guess I'm definitley part of this generation. I think it's too early because many generation yers are in their late teens and early 20s still, some of them even still in middle school. We still have the 2010s to work on! Let's take generation x for example. IN the 80s, most of them already in their teens and twenties, and they didn't really get a label until the early 90s (grunge). Kurt Cobain and Eddie Vedder are gen xers, and they were 24 and 27 when they became famous respectively. So this generation still has a while to go I'm sure, until we can make any definite assumptions and generalities yet."

To the person who wrote that quaot: I totally agree with you, i'm glad someone else thinks with common sense around here. your right, its just to early to be difining us, were still trying to discover who we are, the ONLY thing i can agree on in the article, is the internet movement, which is obvious.

To the author of the gen y article: It's just too EARLY, Many people have different value systems in our generation. People can range from "i won't do anything wrong" people to people who are whores, getting drunk and are on drugs. Many of us are still trying to find ourselves in this everchanging world, i know we'll make a big impact on society, but don't guess what that might be, cause you would proberly be wrong. Many of us are still maturing, were maturing little by little each year, so defining us is stupid, wait till were all at least in our mid-twenties, at least. Sorry, but i just hate articles, like this, that give you a "you should be like this" type theme. Please WAIT a few more years, before assuming what we are like and how we are influenced pleased, thank you.

Computers?

This article seems to suggest that everyone in GenY has always lived around computers and the internet. Why, the computer was very scarce when I was growing up. It was always a 'wow' machine when I saw one, and this was around 1994. The computer didn't become commonplace in my experiences until 1997~. This article assumes that we were born under a computer, I think this assumption would fit more with Gen.Z.

STOP CHANGING THE YEARS

I will just keep changing it back, I have those years reference with a source, please stop changing it back to 1977. I'm sick of this changing back and forth and you better stop.

It ends in 1993 or 1994

What's with this bullshit of it going all the way to 2000 and beyond. I'm sorry, if you cannot recall September 11 or weren't eligible to serve in Iraq or Afghanistan, you cannot be in this generation. We need to be drawing these lines and stop letting some Baby Boomer fuck tell us how it is.

Additionally, it should not be possible for someone AND their child to be part of the same generation. Say, my brother who was born in 1979 had a kid, in 1999, that kid should not be part of the same generation. Thus the line needs to be drawn. And I say it's 1978-1994.

And finally, anybody born after these years could in no way remember even some of the latest trends/news stories including Tickle Me Elmo, Clinton-Lewinksy scandal, the 2000 Election, O.J., Boy Bands, the Y2K scare, Hurricane Andrew, the Chicago Bulls (when basketball was good), Pogs, Disney movies, rap-rock (Korn, Kid Rock), fashion trends (multi-color; tights; baggy/ghetto look) or even remembers what the hell a cassette tape is. There's also a big difference, a major difference between Barney (Gen Y) and the Tellitubbies (Gen ?). These kids also never had Mr. Rogers...only reruns.

We don't even know yet what today's 5-10 year olds will have when they are in high school. It's already clear that they missed out on the culture of the 90s and late 80s...a 15 year period of memory. And they still likely don't understand the significance of the War on Terror or the Bush and Clinton eras.

• Considering the way things are going in Iraq, our grandchildren will probably be eligible to serve:) Wizard1022

07:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

• Yeah, but having your grandchildren in the same generation as you is just plain wrong. The major dividing line between our generation and the next is if you remember 9/11 or not. Plain and simple. Anyone born after that doesn't know what it was like to live in the carefree 90s and then have something like that abruptly happen.
  • I was kidding (notice the smiley face?), and attempting to show how ability to serve in a particular war is not a sound way to determine generation boundaries, as well as taking a jab at the Bush Administration which I love so much. I'm sure everyone has plenty of things in common with their parents' generation, but that does not make the two a single generation. Wizard1022 05:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Changing Article Name Heading

Being apart of this generation (1982) I find it very controversial to keep this article under the name "Generation Y". Like the article states, it automatically assumes connection to the pejorative nature of Generation X. The term Millennials has been just as common in publications. If I had to choose I would choose Millennials and make Generation Y a redirect to it.

In sort, we (this generation) are cool enough to have our own originial name and Generation X can go suck an egg. :PJoshua4 08:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Major Edits to Page Opening and Structure

It is important for everyone to recognize that although the term "Generation Y" is controversial, it is part of every day discourse. As such, and as with any professionally edited encyclopedia, it deserves an entry in Wikipedia under that name. The fact that the term is controversial ought to be mentioned upfront in the article itself, which I have added.

It is also important to remember that there are no definitive years to mark the start or end of a generation. The Howe and Strauss book is very popular, and its years should be mentioned, but they are not definitive. Rather, the upfront definition of the term should admit that various start and end years are commonly used.

Also, sadly several sections of this entry have or still use self-referential first-person "I" comments, numerous parenthetical remarks, and theoretical statements stated as fact followed by long arguments as to why the theories are true - this should not be done on wikipedia.

Finally, I'd like for people working on this article to consider that it is vastly too long - a new entry, perhaps titled "Generation Y and Culture" should be created where all of the cultural stuff can be on its own page.

"The moments that defined Generation Y" subsection

This subsection (The Moments that defined Generation Y) constitutes an individual analysis which is more the work of an essay or thesis arguement. It is not encyclopedic in nature. Remember that encyclopedia's list facts and at time make reference to various arguments, but enclyclopedias do not make arguements themselves.

This section should be removed from the wikipedia in attempt to return this page to Neutrality. It could be replaced with a list of major events during Generation Y years, and cite arguements demographers have made as to why these events are important - but the article should not make the arguments itself.

The first three examples were not moments that defined Generation Y, but rather those that defined Generation X. They have no place in this article.

I agree- The sentence covering the Challenger Disaster calling it "a major national event", should be reworded, as it is plainly USA centric. Calling it a major event would suffice. Also What about the fall of the Berlin wall??. It is not mentioned in

-How could the Virginia Tech Massacre have already been used as a way to define Generation Y when it only happened a week ago?RB3 21:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Major Revisions to Generation Y Page

In an attempt to clean up, wikify, and make accurate the Generation Y page, I have made numerous changes. Notably, none of the pages for other generations (Boomer, X, etc.) are considered to be neutral. This is because people have a strong tendancy to add their personal opinions of their own generation into the article or to make arguments rather than cite generally accepted or proven facts.

This was an extensive problem with the section known as "Music and subcultures" and the other cultural sections of the article. The undocumented claims and rambling in these sections was so extensive, I took the bold move of spinning those sections off into a new article "Generation Y Culture", with the hope that someone will do the huge amount of work it will take to wikify that article. The entirety of that section, unaltered, is now at "Generation Y Culture" but I strongly dissent from anyone who thinks it should be returned to the main Gen Y article without major revision.

I have removed several other unsubstantiated claims, conjectures, and opinions that were not cited from the article, and where possible I have rewritten sections in a more concise manner. Also I have added some sources and correct some incorrect statements (supported by statistics).

I have also made extensive efforts to make the lede as neutral as possible by pointing out the important facts that 1) the term Generation Y is not the only possible term, but it is very commonly used, and 2) no one has the authority to say exactly what the age range of this generation is and that the debate about it is ongoing.

Generation Y makes a huge contribution to the wikipedia, and the page describing us ought to be clean, concise, and free of banners at the top that state it is flawed.

Generation Y Famous People and Cultural Contributors

Generation Y Famous People and Cultural Contributors is a new section I added, though good arguments could be made that such a section is not necessary, as over time it would have to include thousands of people. The section I made is just a start, for someone else to fill in, but it is notable that Generation X has a spin off article called "List of Gen Xers" which might also be appropriate for Generation Y.

Innaccurate Usage and Manupulation of Early Y Partition

I am the person who originally posted the section on the Early or Cold Y Partition both on this page and on the discussion on pages like Gen X and MTV Gen. Someone editing this page has extensively modified my original words and has selectively and arbitrarily changed the dates and wording involved, creatign a serious inconsistency compared to the appearence of Early Y theory on other wikipedia pages. If you desire to challenge existing theories on the various generational diliniations, do it in your own words, and not using a disingenous and innacurate version of mine. I am reverting this page back to its earlier format. If you do not care for my analysis on the issue, either delete them or respond to them, but do not modify them to give the appearence of supporting a position that they really do not.

Original Research is not Permited in Wikipedia

This article was recently inappropriatedly reverted to a past edition that contained original research. This is not permited. Namely, the section on subsets of the generation include the first-person I, indicating that someone was individually pontificating. Please do not attempt to insert personal assertions or individual research as it is a violation of Wikipedia policy.

Also, because the length of this article was inadviseably long, the section on music and cultural consumption had been moved to a new page for reediting. Please do not restore that section to this article without substantial revision.

Response: Use of first-person I is indeed inappropriate, however, this section of the analysis was used for internal clarification of third-party analysis, the subsection as a whole is not independent research or pontification on my part. I will be adding source citations to the end of the article shortly. Firthermore, although I did not author the cultural section, I see no reason to omit it in its entirety. It would seem that several of the recent edits to this page have put a higher premium on being brief than on being informative.

Response to Response: Your removal of first-person was a step in the right direction, however there was and is still work to be done. Your use of all caps and other parenthetical statements such as "for the sake of arguement" is not standard encyclopedia or wikipedia format. Also your writing asserts that the existance of this generational subset is true, rather than theorized by others, a stance which I have changed, though this section could be consisered disputed without citation of source, which I assume you will be adding.

The cultural section was totally out of wiki format, it needs extensive editing and drags down this article in the meantime. It is also totally not neutral and contains vast sections of original research. The only reason I didn't delete it entirely was so as to not upset those who wrote it.

Sign Comments

Please sign your comments on talk pages by using ~~~~. Mred64 04:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Unsigned Comment about why Generation Y Should Start in 1976/1977

I would like to give my two cents before the sociologist, media, ect. finalizes 1978 as begining of generation y. First of all, I don't know why 1976/1977 is not the year. to begin generation y. I am not saying this because I was born late (october) 1976, but I am saying this because it "only makes sense to me." I think that we should figure out the year that generation y begins by the way that the baby boomers thought about figuring out when they would begin the "baby boomers." How did they figure that out anyway? And now is the baby boomer generation begin in 1941-1944 and possibly 1945 and 1946? Does the Baby Boomers begin in 1945 or do they begin in 1946? I'm confused here about that. You hear many different stories in the media. Also, I think that the Vietnam War is a good marker between generation x and y. JFK began to talk to the President in South Vietnam about helping South Vietnam out.It makes good sense to me that generation x should begin in the 1960's or at least during the beginning stages of Vietnam. The Vietnam war ended in 1972. The troops returned in 1973,1974, and most of the troops officially came back in 1975. This (for the most part) ends the Vietnam War and generation x as I know it. I do not feel like I am a generation xer. I feel like I am a yer. I was labeled as a yer by xers. When I read your article about xers, I cannot really realate to it. I was too young for it, I guess. I could remember watching eposoides of the Brady Bunch. I remember Happy Days (which began in 1974) very much because I'm from Wisconsin and we really, really appreciate a show about Wisconsin a whole' lot!!!! I was in high school when grundge came out (like you were) I was 15 going on 16 when that movie (I once knew the name about it, and now I forgot it) came out about generation x. I was 16 going on 17 when "Reality Bites" came out. I am not a slacker, I'm the type of person that you would have to say, slow down, you can't do that yet. If I had my way, I would run for President right now, or start some company or trend, if I could and am not considered "too young" or "just trying to get some of the things in my life started out." Graduating from the high school class of 1995 (I could have been 16 and graduating from high school, but my mom didn't want me to skip first grade and I held myself from graduating in 1994). I noticed in your article that the MTV generation is supposed to be from 1975 to 1985. If this is true, wouldn't it make good sense to you to begin generation y in 1975 (without considering those born in 1974, outside of the MTV generation, even though they could be what I call x/yer's. I coined that new term for those of us who are within five years or so of becoming a part of generation x. What would you say if the media, sociologists or whoever that comes up with this stuff says that generation y should begin in 1982 or 1984, or 1986, or whatever year that they come up with? I think that if they keep the beginning of generation y in the 70's it should be in the mid (1974, 1975, 1976) 70's. This is a nice half way point in the 70's. I think that they should figure out this stuff like they did with the Baby Boomers (did I say that already? I think I might stress it more). Or at least they should coin the 1980's as the beginning of generation y. I don't mean to sound strange, but I feel like a yer, but I'm told that they keep changing the way that generation y should begin. It is confusing anyone born from 1975 to 1985 as to what genertion they are a part of. I'm about ready to write my own book and contact any newspaper I can think of and help them make up their decision. Before generation z graduates from high school would be nice. I guess I am a x/yer (pretty close to a yer). He said this about the guy that I was working with on the campaign (born in 1975) who was a junior/senior from University of Wisconsin Madison (I think it is). I also knew for a fact that I am a older member of a "new kind of generation" when I was three years old (this was ins the summer of 1980, which is the summer that my brother, P.J. was born in). I always thought that my younger brother and I are part of the same generation. After all, we are only three years and eight months apart. My mom is definitely a Baby Boomer (she was born in 1948) My dad is what you called part of the (silent generation). I don't remember what year he was born in (my parents divorced when I was six), but he I knwo that he is less than ten years older than my mom, but he is definitely not a boomer. I think he is just under 65 now. I talk to him every now and then. You are very young. you added some of your opinions as to why 1978 should be the beginning of generation y and that is normal for a paticular year (as you can tell I made my statement known why 1976, or at least 1977 should be the beginning of generation y. I think that you should write a book and write articles in every newspaper that you could think of (Time, Readers Digest, New York Times, ect). That way at least you have put in your "two cents worth" before the media, sociologists, ect. pick out a year in the 1980's for us as the beginning of generation y.

I have something to comment about your opionion that those born in 1978 are a lot happier. I don't think it matters what year you were born in whether or not you are happy. I doin't think that 1978 would mark a year in which you are happy or not. I kind of think that anyone who is born out of the Vietnam war is a different that those born in the process of the war. I think anyone born from 1975 on are more motivatied to do better in preparing for the workplace, a wizekid, what some people might call "whiz kids." I remember when I first started college in 1996 I was helping out with a congressional campaign. I was working with someone who knew my older sister (born in September of 1970) and he told me that I am a yer (or "whatever new generation" that they are coming out with now) Will the editor of the magazinge please e-mail me at tlh102000@yahoo.com. I have something to say about generation y, but I did not figure out how to send my opinion and I was told that my opinion is "to long." You should have a "comments" or a "feedback" page readily accessable from your home page. This will make it easier for people to site there opinion and so that more people will be able to express their opinion as to generation y. I will try later on, but if someone could tell me how to "send" my opinion, that would be greatly appreciated.

Please note, no amount of discussion will certify a starting year for Generation Y, so there is no point in debating whether it is 1976, 1977, 1978, or 1982 as used by Howe and Strauss. This is specificaly why the article cites a wide age range and the fact that there is no consensus. Ivymike21 20:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Avian Flu?

Does the "epidemic" count as culture, since we're including the SARS outbreak? Capitan Obvio 05:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

1994 Gen Z? Give me a break.

Gen Y is not the nineties generation, it's the millenial generation. Yes, remembering the pre late '90s time is a plus, but it's not essential. Gen Z at earliest begins in 1995, at latest 2001 or '02. But yes, 2002 onwards is most certainly not Gen Y. I'd say 1996 or 1997 is the beginning of Z.

As for having to be able to serve in Iraq, bullshite. I'm born in 1990, I'm not Y? I'm not old enough to serve in the army, of course even if I was I wouldn't since this war is BS.

Why are all the celebrities born after 1990 excluded?

I'm sorry, 1991-1994 is not Gen Z. They're late Gen Y. They're not core Y like a 1984er or 1990er is, but they're very much a part of the generation. I'm putting the 1991-1994 celebrities back in, Z doesn't start until 1995 at the earliest. A 1993er would remember the late '90s well enough.

For example I'm a 1979er who remembers the 1980's and the Soviet Union pretty good and the 

more negative media criticizing teenagers in the 80's and 90's. (GenX).

Core of Y?

Speaking as a guy born in 1991, I usually think of the core of Generation Y to be 1984-1993. This may sound rather arbitrary, but I think if you were in high school when Nevermind came out, you're definitely in X, but if you were older than a newborn and not yet in middle school when Cobain died, you are definitely in Y.

However, to be in the core part of Y, you should definitely have at least some memory before the internet took off with the general public around 1997. Memories usually start to develop around the age of 3-4 for most people. So this would probably put the last year for the core of Generation Y at about 1993.

As for Generation Y altogether, I would define the youngest as having at least some memory of the 20th century or having at least some knowledge and recollection of 9/11, so I guess that has the generation ending at 1995-ish (though it may be too soon to tell). It's too complicated to really sort out the oldest Yers, so I'll pick the earliest date set for Y (1977) and average it out with the year before the first core Yers were born in (1983), which makes 1980.

So:

The core of Generation Y - 1984-1993

Generation Y altogether - 1980-1995

I hope that made sense, I'm typing this at 3AM. Any thoughts? - 69.37.79.123

^^Sounds right to me, as a 1990er. I would say the core is 1985 to 1992, inclusive though. 1981-1996 would be the whole gen.

I'd have to agree to some degree with this, as I feel like the bastard child of a nation having been born in mid 1980. Generation X never accepted me, solidified Generation Y now considers me an "old man". As was stated in the main article...I'd consider people like me (roughly, 78-88) "Generation Why?". I use a decade period to clearly define this because I feel a better association with them, and if you want to be fair it may actually be 1978-1986. Regardless, it is always hard if not impossible to determine these things. It just sucks when you don't fit with any generation across the board. Destructive Criticism 02:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

NOTICE OF post of DISPUTE TEMPLATE

regarding this phraseology:

That single marquis event is argued to be September 11, 2001 (9-1-1), the end of relative peacetime and the beginning of wartime,

thus meaning that those not able to remember or appreciate the

• Anybody that has been half-way awake during the last twenty years or so should have noticed many terrorist attacks on US interests far in advance of 9-1-1. This is POV SPIN, not fact.
• Systematic attacks on the West in General, and the US in particular have been occuring since '67 or so, I don't recall the date of entabe (sp?) or the Achille Lauro (again SP?) or the Olympic village massacre (Munich??) and I've been up all night cleaning up after youngsters that are ignorant of their own culture and history. Put it together, or remove the reference, or revise so it's at least accurate.

Best regards, FrankB 10:39, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Cellomangreen 22:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)== Merge Proposal Between Articles iGeneration into Generation Y ==

• iGeneration has a nifty almost eponymous title, but little content. The years overlap, within a reasonable margin of error. OTOH, iGeneration article at least uses the generation template or built a nifty table of their own (Doubt that). See Also: Generations. FrankB 11:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

• • I dont think that they should be merged, Im a meber of the iGen, and Im looking though the Genration Y think, and I cant say i relate to alot of the things discussed there. I rememebr them, but i wasnt much beyond the age of ten. However, I can relate, and am probably driven by, this generaltion of digitalization and what not.It may not be a generation unto itself, but it is certainly a sub-generation worthy of its own article.

Keeperoftheseal 01:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

The naming of a generation before any significant event effected it in its entirety is subject to dispute. The argument can be made that september 11 was such an event, however, the younger segment of this generation aged 6 will not rememer an event that occured when they were one or two years old. The premature evaluation and nomenclature atributed to this generation is all the fabrication of people that have no patience. If given time, this generation will name itself based on a concrete event that it will share in the future. Untill said event has transpired the point is moot.

Sad Generation

"It is interesting to note that Generation Y is more depressed and world aware (via the Internet) than any generation previous, which has led the Generation gaining a stereotype as the "sad generation".

As a member of Generation X who comes in contact with lots of late teens/early 20s through work and personal life, I have to disagree. In my experience, Gen-Ys are not more "world aware." On average, they have little knowledge of current events as a whole, except perhaps on a superficial level. My stronger objection is to the claim that they are "more depressed," which I have to believe must have been written by a Gen-Y (correct me if I am wrong). Most Gen-Ys I have talked to about the matter seem pretty optimistic about the future. Many baby boomers and some Gen-X grew up expecting to see the world destroyed in a nuclear holocaust. "Eve of Destruction"? Mad Max? On the Beach? To us, those were real. I know people who basically wasted their lives because they thought civilization would end before they could do anything meaningful. That is depressed. Maestlin 01:20, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm a member of generation Y, but I'd have to say that while world events do bother me and I think the world is getting worse, it more extremely frustrates me that we can't do much about it yet than it makes me sad or depressed. I wouldn't say we're optomistic (is that even possible this day in age?), but we're ready to try to fix the mistakes of the previous generations and do our best to make the world a somewhat better place. Redtitan 22:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Generation V notice

I just categorized Generation V. I believe that article is synonymous with this or iGeneration. I am however not American and have very little knowledge about this subject so I leave it to you people to determine. Regards, Gardar Rurak 07:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Second thoughts

Hello, it's mister 1991 again. I've been having some second thoughts on my Gen-Y comments...

I'm utterly baffled by some inclusions of people born in the latter half of the 1970s into Generation Y. Using my (still somewhat arbitrary) use of Nevermind, if you were old enough to feel teen angst (youngest being like 12-14) when that album came out, you are part of Generation X, period. Definitely not Y, definitely not on the "XY" cusp, but X. So I would say 1979 is the last year of X. Plus, people born in the late 70s would have not been able to appreciate the rise of the internet age in their childhood or at the latest their early-mid teens, which I think is a big factor for Gen-Y. Then again, that applies to kids born in 1980 too, so I suppose I should change my personal view of the earliest Gen-Yers to 1982, as most 1980 kids would have been juniors and seniors in high school by the time the internet became so widely avaliable, which seems a bit late to really say they were raised in the digital era.

Now as for the core of Y, and the latest Gen-Yers, I won't budge. I think of Gen-Y as being people who were raised in an era of transition to the internet age. I seriously doubt anyone born past 1995 could appreciate that transition, as they are unlikely to have any memory of the 20th century, for that matter, or have solid recollection of 9/11.

So, after some second thinking:

All of Generation Y: 1982 - 1995 Core of Y: 1984 - 1993

So, I would now say Gen-Y is a narrow 13-year generation. Hope that wasn't too disjointed.

A generation should not be named after something they did when they were teenagers. We don't call those who grew up in the 1960's the POT generation do we? It is also unfair to quickly label todays young people "iGeneration" This phrase was invented my some twisted mega-nostagliac soccer mom and should not be incorperated at the name for generation Y

--Well, my grouping for Y is work-in-progress. I wouldn't make a completely definitive categorization of Gen-Y for another 10 or so years. It could very easily be extended to something like 1979-1998.

I agree on iGeneration, though, it's a cheesy alternative to Generation Y that was probably invented by some 40-something journalist who overestimates his or her cleverness.

Other Countries

Why is there so little information on this generation, or any of the other generations, in other countries? Or are they in other articles?71.31.158.148 21:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes. The answer is somewhat sociological. Generations are in part defined by a shared socio-historical experience, or more simply stated, members of a generation share the same culture. The group of people referred to as "Generation Y" in the United States, losely defined that they are, are disctinct from youth in other parts of the world, especially those that are vastly different from the United States on the developmental scale. A generation is simply not "everyone born on earth in a given set of years". Some will argue, and the article states this, that all people in this age group in the Anglophone developed world, such as the US, Canada, U.K, Australia, and New Zeland, can be thought of as Gen Y as their are many shared behaviors and shared cultural consumption of these groups. Some go further suggesting that all of the European Union, Japan, and other high developed countries can be included. Strictly speaking though, Generation Y refers to the United States. Annecdotely, consider the Baby Boomers - the name only applies in those countries affected by a post-World War II population expansion. Ivymike21 18:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm deleting 21st century emo. I hardly think it defines this generation, if anything its more of the myspace generation.

I find this: "Generation Y is generally considered to be the last generation of Americans wholly born in the 20th century...At times, the term is extrapolated beyond the United States to refer to similarly aged youth in the Western World or Anglophone World." a little hard to stomach, given that the term Generation Y comes from Generation X, which was popularized by a Canadian (Douglas Coupland). I see no reason why it should be identified as American. We could just as easily say it refers to Canadians, and is extrapolated to the U.S. Who decided it refers primarily to the American experience?Roger 09:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Generation Y - Born 1977/78 - 1995/96

Just to add my 2 cents to this argument. For me, Generation Y is characterised as the Boomer Echo generation that had to adjust during teenage years to the rise of computers, growth of the Internet and increasing inter-connectedness of life - symbolised finally in the prevalence of mobile phones/cell phones.

In regards to computers. Computers were becoming mainstream and important devices from the late 1980s through to the mid 1990s. By about 1992, practically every family would have had at least one computer at home. I can recall that we bought our 3rd home computer in 1992. Another fact, by 1994/95/96 many schools had made it compulsory for all students attending the school to have a laptop as part of their education. The school I was at introduced this policy in 1994 for all students to have a laptop, which continues of course to this day.

Another fact, the rise of the Internet to a utility of mass cultural significance was around 1994/95 - 2000/2001. By 2001, there could be no doubt about the centrality of the Internet in everyday life. In the year 1995 the Internet really started exploding and integrating itself into every part of one's life and the momentum is still going today. I can well remember the time as I created my first personalised email account in late 1995.

The third part of this revolution was the growth and basic explosion and proliferation of Mobile Phones - At a rate of growth that even exceeded that of the Internet. For me at least this really began happening in 1998, and by mid 1999 (In Australia) pracitcally everyone in my age had a mobile phone. At the time I was 19.

The question is, if you accept, as I do, the centrality of the growth of the Internet, and then the subsequent wave of mobile technology, and the fact that Generation Y is associated with the growth and explosion of these technologies - where do you set the boundaries for this generation?

To me, someone born when all of these technologies have become common-place is part of the following generation. Sometimes called Generation Z, sometimes called other things. Given that I have previously identified 2001 as perhaps the first year that the Internet was not the new kid on the block - afterall, how it could it be - after 5 years of booming the Internet stocks had crashed and burned in 2000 and the Internet had started to become just a part of the background noise of everyday life - although of course innovations still flood in and its growth continues at a great rate - it is no longer the new kid on the block.

Given that, one then has to find a defining event to signify the end of the Generation. And obviously, it is September 11. Given that occured in September 2001, and that to be a member of Generation Y one must have some real memory of that day and the general mood and feeling it provoked - that would suggest to me that anyone younger than 5, ie - anyone not yet at school, is therefore a part of the following generation. Which means that Generation Y must end around 1995/96. Anyone born around 1995/96 would pretty much have grown up with the whole interconnected world as commonplace - but has perhaps older siblings who remember a slightly less connected world and the growth of the Internet. To me, that just squeezes them into Generation Y at the young end.

Then comes the harder task of defining where Generation Y begins. For me, yes, that is a tougher question to answer, but I am absolutely certain it is not as late as 1982/83. That gives only a 12/13 year Generation! Hardly a sufficient time-span for classifying a Generation! To me a generation is a period of around 15-20 years in which there are many defining characteristics of people born within that era - and its about 20 years until one's children are likely to start reproducing - another important consideration in defining a Generation IMO!

Looking at post-war history, one sees

Approximate Dates Baby Boomers Born (1946 - 1961/62) Generation X Born (1961/62 - 1977/78) Generation Y Born (1977/78 - 1995/96)

Looking at that, that makes Generations X & Y roughly equivalent in length, which seems sensible to me.

For me, one of my earliest memories of a major world event was the Challenger Disaster, which occured in January 1986. I was 6 at the time. Shortly after that, a matter of months, was the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. I guess that I would approach these facts by saying that people older than I who can remember significant world events that occured prior to Challenger & Chernobyl are perhaps part of the tail-end of Generation X, whereas they almost signify the start of Generation Y - in a way.

Challenger represented perhaps the end of the Golden (Naive) Era of Space exploration, an era untainted by such a disaster, and Chernobyl in a way represented the crumbling nature of the Soviet Union. That such a disaster could occur said volumes about the fact that the Communist system was beginning to crack and break-up and within 3 years it would in fact disintegrate under Gorby's perestroika.

One thing I would like to say to those who say Generation Y begins with people born around 1982/83. Do you accept that the rise of computers and the Internet into everyday life are one of the defining characteristics of being a member of Generation Y? I was born in 1979, and given it was compulsory at high-school to have a laptop, a word-processor, a spreadsheet etc. etc. for people of my age - does that make people of my ilk - born 1978/79/80 more appropriately pigeon-holed into Generation X or Y? I have to say, one impression I don't get of Generation X is that computers were such a central part of their lives - it was more `MTV'

Being a teenager through the 90s, 1992-1999, and growing up with bands like the Spice Girls, Backstreet Boys and Aqua blaring out their teeny-bopper music all over the airwaves, I definitely consider that not to have anything to do with Generation X, sounds much more like Generation Y to me.

I would just pose one final question, in thinking about those aforementioned bands, Spice Girls, Backstreet Boys, Aqua, do people associate those bands with Generation X or Generation Y?

If it is Generation Y, then it figures that Generation Y began around 1977/78 as I would postulate, if it is Generation X - then I respectfully have to disagree with you! jkm 00:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

• Your generation demarcations seem very accurate and sensible to me. Good work! How do you think each generation should be divided into early/middle/late stages though? I think that for Gen Y, early would be 1978-1982, middle 1983-1988, and late 1989-1995. Wizard1022 03:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

• • Yep, pretty much agree with you Wizard. To me, early Gen Y would have some memory of the Cold War, which of course ended in 1989. So, 1978-1982/83 would make sense. For middle, 1983-1988/89 makes sense as well, and late Gen Y 1989-1995/96 yep. So no arguments there! jkm 07:34, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Continuing Changes to the Page

It seems that over the past 6 months, various people who frequent this page have been going back and forth arguing over what years constitute Generation Y, changing the dates in the article, removing names they think are "too early" or "too late". Please remember that as the lede paragraphs state, there is NO CONSENSUS as to what ages constitute Generation Y, and the U.S. Census Bureau does not have a legal definition. To remain factual, the article must remain neutral on this issue, throughout alluding to the full possible range of years that are cited in the real world. Stop wasting time fighting over the years and work on actually improving this article. Ivymike21 20:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Merge with iGeneration

Since no one suggested why iGeneration should be merged with Generation Y, I removed that tag, based on the fact that the iGeneration article defines something distinct from Generation Y, though one may indeed be a subset of the other. Ivymike21 20:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Again... Who Writes This?!?!

A previous point, which I posted for Generation X, comes screaching into the face of enlightened skeptical inquiry in regard to the description of Generation Y. How is it even relatively possible to have someone who's 20 and someone who is 5 in the same generation??? Think... the person who is 20 is living in the prime of his/her generation as is, the kid who is 5???... In fifteen years he/she will be 20, so much of the world will be differnt by then that perhaps it will take that long for the infamous "THEY" who come up will tripe like this to realize that you cannot lump people together like "THEY" are doing!

- Unsigned Comment

Dear Unsigned Person,

For some perspective, the Baby Boomer Generation is regularly defined as those born fropm 1945 to 1964, a 19 year age difference from oldest to youngest. There is no rule that everyone in a generation has to have all the same experiences. Generational demographics is more art than science. Ivymike21 14:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Generation Y is a lame name

Can we at least have a cool name? Like "Children of Technology" or "Infobator Generation" referring to being the first group to grow up after the Internet growth inflextion point and exposure to the quickest acceleration of data access ever in the history of humanity. Naming it after a website like Google or Myspace is limiting and limiting it to a TV station is simply ridiculous. And naming if after the previous generation is just lazy. --If we are going to name it after a brand or product, I think Transformers is the best choice sinc everyone likes Transformers and it's very international. Flangazor 16:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

-THose names are complete and utter shite. Generation Y is infinitely better. S3janus 07:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

I think it's a lame name, too, but Wikipedia reports what is. Don't blame wikipedia for the name, "we" are not naming anything, we're just writing about what others have termed this generation. Gen Y is a pretty bland, meaningless term but whatchagonnado. --Zagsa 16:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

It's not that lame a name. Do you know Y it was adopted? Not just because it comes after X, but also because people of Generation Y are supposed to question authority, and question their identity, and question what they're doing with their lives, and so on and so forth. Choosing Y as a moniker is an indication of this Generation's so-called curiousity. jkm 13:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Birth Years

Since this article and others have so many different opinions on the boundaries of Generation Y, could we please create a list here of all those opinions so we can at least try to reach some conclusion on this.

• The article says that it is 1976-2001.
• Market research uses 1978-2000.
• The American Generations template says 1977-2003.
• The template at the bottom of the article says (1976-1982)-(1995-2001).
• Some say that the September 11 attacks are the boundary between Generation Y and Generation Z, though this seems somewhat limited to America.

Believe me, September 11 is not an Amero-Centric event. It occured at around 11pm, Australian Eastern side and pretty much the entire population would have been watching it live on their TVs, just as most Americans would have seen it. It is not the least bit American-Centric - that single event has driven Australian, and British for that matter, foreign policy ever since - and other countries, though they may have not gone into Iraq, their foreign policy has still been hugely shaped by that event and thus have their societies. Can we get away from the myth that September 11 was something that only effected Americans. Cheers. jkm 02:16, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I should've been more clear. I didn't mean that it hasn't had much of an effect outside of the US, because it has. What I was trying to say was that it isn't really a definitive point between two generations. An important event that caused many changes, but not one that caused such drastic changes as to suddenly create a new generation. Sorry about that. 71.31.145.55 02:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry - you don't have to apologise! Thanks anyway, but I have to disagree with you. I think it has had a huge effect on world society - it basically propelled US Foreign Policy in an entirely new direction, a direction that has prompted all sorts of reactions from countries around the world. As a defining event, you can't really ask for much more than that - the world over! Wars in Afghanistan, Iraq - and maybe North Korea? Syria? in future are basically direct results of September 11 and I'd have to say they're a pretty big deal. Also, allied with September 11 - given it occurred and is occurring around the same time is the Internet revolution and the invasion of IT into all aspects of our lives. This began in the 90s - late Generation Y, and is accelerating into the 21st century such that Generation Z is basically completely wired up from a very young age. For me, Generation Y is kind of a bridging Generation I guess, but I'm straying. jkm 13:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

I would like this article rewrote, removing all mentions of American. Generation Y is not and never was restricted to America. I see no need for the Americans in such as this. "Using the broadest definition commonly cited, Generation Y currently (as of 2006) includes Americans in their mid and early 20s, teenagers and children over the age of 5. At times, the term is extrapolated beyond the United States to refer to similarly aged youth in the Western World or Anglophone World." I am Amused by the words "beyond the United States"... My Suggestion - Remove all mentions of a specific country UNLESS they are stastical (and are RELIABLE statistics sources). --Timmah01 11:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, right now the article is somewhat American-centric. Though it's usually only called this in the English speaking world, anything about the generation in other countries would be greatly appreciated. 69.40.249.231 03:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

"Using the broadest definition commonly cited, Generation Y currently (as of 2006) includes those in their mid and early 20s, teenagers and children over the age of 5." DELETED. Contradicts the following sentence that states there is no concensus over the actual years of birth.

RESTORED. Goes with the broadest definition cited, which the article uses, 1976-2001. Ivymike21 04:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Shouldn't we use (1976-82)-(1995-2001) instead. The years are disputed, and using 1976-2001 could make people believe that these are the official birthyears. Actually, if you scroll up a bit, you can see that there are already five different dates being used in the article right now. 69.40.240.98 18:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Class of 2009

I read in the New York Times today that the graduating class of 2009 will be 3.2 million, the largest so far in the history of the US. It will also be the largest so far in the "echo boom" (Generation Y). Should this be put into the article? 69.40.249.231 03:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Reference that uses the term "Millenials"

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_38/b4001601.htm?chan=careers_first+jobs_top+story Kevin143 22:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

A German view on this article

I am a German born in early 1984 and I certainly don't feel that I share the same generation with anyone born in the 1990s. I can hardly relate to anyone born after 1985 or 1986. They listen to a different kind of music (mostly hip-hop), while people born between 1975 and 1985 listen mostly to rock or techno/trance.

Also, if you were born in Germany during the early 80s you usually still remember the partition, the fall of the Berlin wall and the reunification. And then there is the introduction of the Euro in 2002. Almost all of us were adults when that happened. I still bought my first car with Deutschmarks (German currency from 1948 to 2001). Someone born in the 1990s does not have any relation to the old currency and those born past ca. 1998 won't even remember it at all. To them, the Deutschmark probably means the same as the Reichsmark (German currency from ca. 1870s to 1948) means to me. We have memories about the Helmut Kohl-era and some of us were even old enough to vote for him in the 1998 elections.

And computers were (at least in Germany) nowhere near as common as today until approximately 1995. The children of the 1990s grew up with modern computers. We had 8/16 bit video games (like the NES/original Games Boy/SNES) and home computers/pre-Windows 95 PCs which were a lot closer to what Generation X had during the 1980s than to modern games. Most people still had to learn how to use the command prompt in DOS or something comparable. I don't think a lot of people born in the 1990s let alone those born in 2000 will ever know how to use it except when they need to do so professionally. There was no affordable private access to the Internet until like 1995/6 as well. Most of us did not have Internet access before we were teenagers. And computers were still considered 'nerdy' until at least 1998.

Furthermore, the television industry in Germany was fundamentally different from the US until the mid to late 1990s. Up until 1984 there were only three or four government-run networks (in Western Germany ARD, ZDF and one or two regional channels, depending on where you lived). There were no child channels at all until the late 1990s, and by then we were to old to watch them. The Generation Y culture page lists Spongebob as the trademark cartoon of Generation Y. Spongebob means nothing to most of us. The X-Files is not even on that although it was as far as I recall a huge hit in the mid to late 1990s. It certainly means a lot more to me and all of my friends than Spongebob or that awful piece of c*** called Pokemon. No one in my entire class watched that.

I'm probably not in the same generation as someone born in 1968 or even 1974, but I have to say that I don't feel that someone born in 1988 or 1991, let alone a "millennium baby", is in the same generation as I am. Maybe those born between 1979/80 and 1985/86 are a generation on their own, maybe they are in the same generation as those born 1975-78 and 1987-89, but they definitely have almost nothing in common with those born during the 1990s. Forgive me the rant, but I get really pissed when some little kid born in like 1992 who doesn't remember anything about the pre-digital world and could not live without his myspace account wants to tell me that I am like him. I am not and I will never be.

P.s. Sorry about my bad English

84.44.195.246 23:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Watch me provide a definitive scope for Gen Y

Hello. I was born in late December 1979 and consider myself a member of Generation Y. I didn't always consider myself a Gen Y'er (or indeed a member of any generation), but after reading an article in American Demographics about this new generational classification (Gen Y didn't exist as a term AFAIK even ten short years ago) I found out that I am truly classifiable as Generation Y.

What is Generation Y? According to the article, it is comprised of individuals who were born between the years 1977 - 1994. And while I can't find the original article that I found this definition at, I have found quite a few resources online that utilize this and the other generation definitions that I found in the original article. The Ohio Library and Information Network defines Generation Y using the same scope under Business & Industry > Concept Terms. So does the Canadian Women's Business Network. William J. Schroer, i.e. "The Social Librarian", uses the exact same definitions I saw in the original American Demographics article. So do American Sports Data, Inc., Business Wire, and management adviser [3] Juergen Daum. Generation Y is also defined as "born between 1977 and 1994" by the United States Postal Service, in a press release from October 2005.

So I do think it'd be best to utilize this 1977 - 1994 scope for Generation Y. It's the definition that makes the most sense to me, and is used by a LOT of organizations (the aforementioned are just examples). (Krushsister 03:16, 8 October 2006 (UTC))

How can Gen Y include people born as late as 2003?

I look in amazement at this article when I see the argument advanced that Generation Y can go as late as 2003! Given the term was first used to describe those born around 1977-1994/5 - the generation that grew up as the technological revolution was entering a hyper-phase - which basically started around 1996 and has been speeding along ever since - particularly for the 1996-2000 period. The generation that grew up as mobile phones and the Internet were becoming a widespread phenomena - the generation that grew up in a time of unmatched Global Peace, and unmatched Global Prosperity - which continues today but started with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. How can people, who may be 2 or 3 years old - if born in 2003 - realistically be considered a part of this Generation? The people born in 2001/02/03 will be entering their teenage years in 2014, and exiting their teenage years as late as 2023 - when they turn 20! These people will be experiencing their life-shaping events in the late 2010s - these people won't even remember President Bush as anything more than a grainy image of their toddlerhood - as they were too young. These people will be completely immersed in the technological revolution in a way that those born even 10 years ago won't have experienced at all.

I agree with the poster directly above me - and to counter the argument we're advancing - can someone who advocates Generation Y extending as late as 2003 explain to me - and others, how on Earth a 2yr old of today can have any conception of September 11, Al-Qaeda, the War in Iraq, the War in Afghanistan - the Global War on Terror - its quite possible that by the time this kid reaches his/her teenage years this period may have passed into history OR entered a terrifying new stage. Who knows? How could a 2yr old today have any conception of how the rise of the Internet and interconnectivity changed the world out of all recognition - how the rise of China is changing the shape of the world as we know it - by the time a 2yr old of today is a teenager - China will be entrenched as one of the few global powers - but it wasn't 10 years ago.

For me, there is a clear ending point to Generation Y. It is September 11th, 2001. The world really did change in a big way that day - and ever since its been heading in a very different direction than it was beforehand. To have a true concept of how things have changed - its completely obvious that anyone able to recognise that change must have also experienced at least a touch of how life was beforehand - which means to me - that that person must have been 5-6 yrs old on the day the twin towers came down - which reflects back to say that Generation Y must end in 1995/96. KIds younger than that may remember September 11th, and seen it on their TV screens - but what can they recall from the world before September 11th? Have they got any basis of comparison between the world since September 11th to the world before then? I would doubt it. 155.143.213.124 08:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

• I was born in 1984 and I fully agree with you on every last point. Also, I'm a marketing major in college so generational demographics is a big topic in my major, and all my textbooks have cited 1977-1994 as the timeframe of Generation Y. Not to mention that 1977-1994 is simply a commonsense definition of our generation. Strauss & Howe's definition is about five birth years off on both the start and end date for the generation. Also, keep in mind that their book was written in 1991, an entire decade before 9/11 and long before anyone knew what the heck an Internet was. EJ220 21:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Edits made

Taken out these lines: With respect to Canada and the United States - because it serves no purpose whatsoever. And it still maintains all the facts without it.

Unless there is a specific citing of this phrase im rewording it.

Every reference to "only canadians or Americans" was deleted or modified. THE TERM IS WORLDWIDE AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN. If you can find some credible source that says it started in america or canada, then you put it here - otherwise, this stays deleted.

Deleted whole second paragraph, because it was biased and redundant of the first paragraph.

Also can we have a source for this paragraph - because it sounds like heavy opinion to me - how can you accept prediction as fact?

"A notable demographic shift will begin to occur in 2010 when the oldest Baby Boomers (b. 1945) hit the United States' legal retirement age of 65. As boomers retire, more members of Generation X will take roles in middle and upper management and the large membership of Generation Y will take up positions in the lower half of the workforce, a process which could have possibly begun since some definitions have members of Gen Y in their late-20s."

All all this stuff about the GI generation and all that sort - ive never heard of. If you think thats widely accepted, your very much mistaken. What I suggest is that all the Country specific stuff should go under international differences, and the rest talk about generation Y

I also have doubts as whether issues such as hurricane katrina and all have much to do with this - sure, they are events that happened when this generation are living.

You also put gay rights in here... now what the heck does that have to do with this genereation? people have been fighting for gay rights all the time. It seems to me like someone had a little rant in here.

There are a LOT of other things id like to say about this - but to sum it up - Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral. I also cannot believe that none of you even attempted to edit this.

If i could, id rewrite the whole thing - and the only thing for different countries I would put in, is under a seperate heading - Generation Y International - events and culture labels.

Sigh, I thought id be finished, but no, Im only half way done - another prime example of heavy bias

" In a strict sense, the term "Generation Y" and its variations can be said to refer only to the United States, but the close cultural connection between the U.S. and other Western countries has led to the term being used to describe any youth culture, even if the emerging generation does not bear any characteristic similarities to the United States version of "Generation Y" besides chronological birth years." Deleted paragraph and changed heading.

There are some paragraphs which i would dearly like to edit, but the bias is so heavily embedded, that I couldnt without damaging the content of the article. Timmah01 03:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

American Generations Box

Per discussion on this page, and reality, Generation Y is not a term soley applied to the United States. Sometimes, the use of Generation Y is meant to dennote only an American cohort, but that is not always the case. Because of this, the American Generations box should not be prominently displayed at the top of the article as if America is the only applicable use of Generation Y. It has been moved to the section on the United States. Ivymike21 21:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Question/Comment from Firestarter710

Hi. This is for the man who wrote this website. I noticed that you had edited your description of the different generations since I viewed your site last year. Nice Work!!!! I had a philosophy of what each generation should be like and your shorter table of the different generations was close to the philosophy that had made sense to me. I am working on an article that will describe my theory as to what the generational lines should be and how I am not please with the current methods and the generation table that was created in 1991 (old school). Any pointers? Firestarter710

Firestarter: Wikipedia is a collaborative effort among thousands of people from around the world, and as such, one person did not "write this website," though one person may have contributed a good deal of content to a particular article. You should probably read WP:NOT as well as WP:About and the Main wikipedia article. There have been over 2000 separate edits to this article, and more than 300 different people made the last 500 edits. Hopefully, one of the primary watchers of this article will see your question and hopefully be able to provide some advice. --Mattarata 20:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

internet gen

i think that the internet gen should start alot earlyr —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.29.3.172 (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC).

generation y

Generation y should be anyone who was in school or their late teens on the september 11 attacks of 2001, which would include anyone born between 1981/1982 to 1997 because they would all remember what was going because it would be very important in the school to inform everyone and they would also remember how life was like before the attacks because their memory would begin at the age of 4 or sometimes as early as 3 years old. This event was huge and it change many people's views on the world so to conclude, the generations should be like this: - Baby Boomer: 1946-1964/65 - Generation X: 1965-1980/81 - Generation Y: 1981-1996/97

Compulsory school starts at kindergarten, which starts at age 5. Those born in 1997 were not in compulsory school when it happened, 1997 and 1998 were in preschool, which doesn't count. Even 1996 was just barely starting kindergarten when 9/11 happened, so is 9/11 really relevant to them? Nope, they barely had memories formed, to remember much or adequately, some don't even remember it at all. The 9/11 generation is 1983-1995.