Talk:Mini Hollywood

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the Spanish cinema task force.

Amusement Parks Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Texas Hollywood[edit]

This wretched article should clearly be merged (with “Texas Hollywood”). I'm not sure which of the two articles should be the principal. —SlamDiego_←T 04:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Tibo has created three pages representing the three studios all in close proximity Texas Hollywood, Mini Hollywood, Western Leone. I think they should be kept seperate as they are all seperate tourist attractions. He has also created List_of_films_shot_in_Almería which does combine them all and is unwieldly. There are also other list, might not be so comprehensive from the spaghetti western pages.REVUpminster (talk) 11:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - If you're willing to provide the clean-up and coördination of these articles, then I will not object to your removal of the merger tag. —SlamDiego_←T 11:06, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have put the English name of each film and a link to it's wiki page and at the bottom a link to imdb because I was surprised to find Mad Max there but it is rightREVUpminster (talk) 16:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I would say the three articles should be merged together into a American West Theme parks in Almeria or something. Reliable sources do not go in depth into individual origins or backgrounds of the parks; an overview history is more covered. However, there may be Spanish sources that do this. Jappalang (talk) 03:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cite the films please[edit]

Per the reasonings I raised in Talk:Texas Hollywood#Citations needed for films, such items should be sourced. Sometimes, these attributions are by guesses/original research (from comparing the on-screen images to photographs), or hearsay. Jappalang (talk) 03:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movies

Films or scenes within films using Mini Hollywood :

For a Few Dollars More (1965, Clint Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef)
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (1966, Clint Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef)
The Legend of Frenchie King, also known as Petroleum Girls (1971, Brigitte Bardot, Claudia Cardinale)
Red Sun (1971, Charles Bronson, Ursula Andress)
Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985, Mel Gibson, Tina Turner)
Blueberry (2004, Vincent Cassel)

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mini Hollywood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121014152749/http://www.oasysparquetematico.com/rodaje-de-la-serie-britanica-doctor-who/ to http://www.oasysparquetematico.com/rodaje-de-la-serie-britanica-doctor-who/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]