Jump to content

Talk:Minnesota Vikings boat party scandal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

[edit]

This ain't Watergate folks Smith03 16:48, 21 October 2005 (UTC) but if people have to give it own page you should at least put the year 2005 in the title, so future historians known which "sex Scandal" we are talking about Smith03 16:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


"Known locally in Minnesota as Danglegate 2005" I don't know that I would agree with that, can't say I have heard many people calling it Danglegate 2005 around townSmith03 19:43, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

so are we going to post all the remaing games of the season?Smith03 00:00, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

who is scooter? Smith03 21:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Current event

[edit]

I'm not sure whether this should have {{currentevent}} as opposed to {{current sport}}. While the event involves mainly athletes on a sport team, the event in question is unrelated to any sporting events. KramarDanIkabu 03:33, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, the only part of the event that is current is the legal part. I would not call this a sports-related event either. John 01:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed name change of page

[edit]

2005 Minnesota Vikings boat cruise scandal

first add the year of event in case we have future ones also i think using the term sex here is more sensational than it needs to be. IMO the local media here in MSP have for the most part lately be using boat crusise to describe the events as oppose to sex scandal. Smith03 14:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this needs it's own page

[edit]

This event brought national media attention and was all over the front page of the Minneapolis newspapers for about a week after it happened. It has since surfaced to the front page over and over again when support for a new football stadium dropped sharply due to this event, when the criminal charges were filed, and when Culpepper's charges were dropped. It is indeed significant enough to warrant it's own page, due to the sheer size of the article at the very least.

Necessary Details?

[edit]

Is it really important to know what sexual acts were committed with which players? Do we need to know what McKinnie did with a Dildo or anything else? I wanted to know what the Love Boat affair was, not about all the things you can do with a prostitute. Just a suggestion to revise this and have less graphic detail as anyone, including ten year olds, can access this information and then link straight to the pages for the sexual acts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.181.1 (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how the details aren't relevant, also, see WP:NOTCENSORED. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 18:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What makes this consensual sexual behavior between adults "inappropriate?" Why is this wiki article editorializing the appropriateness of the sexual conduct? The article could easily, and more accurately state that not all people participated rather than saying not everyone was inappropriate.Jsingleton82 (talk) 00:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Minnesota Vikings boat party scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minnesota Vikings boat party scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Minnesota_Vikings_boat_party_scandal&oldid=1249942260"