Talk:Minolta 110 Zoom SLR

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Minolta 110 Zoom SLR article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Infobox

I've just added an Infobox to this article, which contains an image of the original Minolta 110 Zoom SLR. The Infobox that was already here used to contain such an image (much better than mine, in fact) but now contains an image of what I presume to be the “MkII” version, which is very different. I suspect that in making that change, the user who replaced this picture merely put the image of the MkII in place of the original image, and changed the caption to reflect this, but did not change the specifications, as these specifications appear to be correct for the original 110 Zoom SLR.

Perhaps the MkII should have its own article, as I understand it to be a very different camera from the original Minolta 110 Zoom SLR; but if it is going to remain in this article, then surely someone who is sufficiently familiar with it should put the correct specifications here.

Bob Blaylock (talk) 22:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]